Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Nancy Werner-Leible v. Le Lu Metalcraft

Decision date: July 25, 200710 pages

Summary

The Missouri LIRC modified the administrative law judge's award, finding that the employee is permanently and totally disabled due to the combination of her work-related back injury and pre-existing disabilities (including fibromyalgia), rather than the work injury alone, thus triggering Second Injury Fund liability. The Commission affirmed all other findings regarding medical causation and entitlement to future medical care for the knees and back.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION
(Modifying Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 98-103055
Employee:Nancy Werner-Leible
Employer:Le Lu Metalcraft
Insurer:American Protection Insurance Company
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident:September 17, 1998
Place and County of Accident:St. Louis County
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, subsequent to reviewing the evidence and considering the entire record, the Commission modifies the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated February 7,2007.
I. Preliminary Matters
The Commission affirms all findings and conclusions of the administrative law judge, but for the finding that employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the workinjury alone. The administrative law judge concluded that 1) employee’s back injury was medically and causally related to her work injury; 2) employee is entitled to future medical care and treatment for her knees and back; and 3) employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of her workinjury alone, and she is entitled to permanent total disability payments beginning March 30, 2005.
II. Second Injury Fund Liability
Permanent Total Disability
The Commission disagrees with the determination that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to the last injury in and of itself. Rather, we believe the evidence demonstrates that employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of her workinjury and pre-existing disabilities, triggering Second Injury Fund liability.
To trigger the liability of the Second Injury Fund, an employee must have a pre-existing permanent partial disability, whether from a compensable injury or otherwise. Section 287.220.1; "The permanent disability pre-dating the injury in question must 'exist at the time the work-related injury was sustained and be of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to employment or re-employment should the employee become unemployed.'" See also 287.220.1. To determine whether a pre-existing partial disability constitutes a hindrance or obstacle to the employee's employment, "the Commission should focus on the potential that the pre-existing injury may combine with a future work related injury to result in a greater degree of disability than would have resulted if there was no such prior condition." Liability of the Second Injury Fund is triggered only "by a finding of the presence of an actual and measurable disability at the time the work injury is sustained."
E. W. v. Kansas City, Missouri, School District, 89 S.W.3d 527, 537 (Mo.App. W.D. 2002), overruled on other grounds, Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. banc 2003).

The record demonstrates that employee did suffer from actual and measurable disabilities at the time of her workrelated injury that were a hindrance or obstacle to employment. Therefore, employee is not permanently and totally disabled as a result of the work injury alone. The evidence supports a finding that employee's pre-existing disabilities combined with her work-related injury to render her permanently and totally disabled.

Employee provided testimony with regard to her pre-existing conditions. She testified that she was diagnosed with fibromyalgia several years preceding her work-related injury. She testified that her symptoms from the condition included: chronic fatigue, depression, sleep deprivation, achiness, weakness, poor grip, tenderness and difficultly raising her arm. She stated that most days she feels like she has the flu. Employee testified that she has received continuous treatment for the condition since she was diagnosed. She takes prescription medication and receives trigger point injections when she needs additional relief. Employee testified that prior to 1998 that she was having a lot of problems with sleep and depression as well as pain and fatigue. She testified that she experienced these symptoms on a daily basis. Employee also testified that she had carpal tunnel syndrome on the right and subsequently had surgery in 1983 or 1984. Following the surgery employee had a resumption of her symptoms including tingling and numbness in her right hand as well as to pain in her wrist and arm.

Employee also provided testimony regarding disabilities resulting from her work injury. She testified that she continues to experience persistent pain in her back and bilateral knees. Employee testified that she must elevate her legs for approximately half the day in order to help alleviate her knee pain. She testified that she began experiencing persistent back pain following her right total knee replacement in 2001. An MRI in November 2001 revealed a moderate central disc protrusion. Employee testified that the back pain persisted after her left total knee replacement in 2002. A second MRI in December 2003 revealed a central disc herniation with degenerative findings and facet disease. Employee testified that she continues to suffer chronic back pain for which she receives epidural steroid injections.

Employee's testimony was supported by expert opinions of Dr. Poetz and Mr. England. With regard to her workrelated injury, Dr. Poetz opined employee suffered a 50\% permanent partial disability to the lower right extremity as measured at the right knee directly resultant from the September 17, 1998 injury and a 50\% permanent partial disability to the lower left extremity as measured at the left knee directly resultant from the September 17, 1998 injury. Dr. Poetz opined employee suffered a 40\% permanent partial disability ( 30 % work-related and 10\% preexisting) rated at the spine.

Dr. Poetz provided ratings regarding employee's pre-existing conditions. He concluded employee suffered a 25\% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to fibromyalgia; a 35\% permanent partial disability to the upper right extremity as measured at the right hand and wrist; and a 20\% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole as measured at the cardiovascular system. Dr. Poetz opined employee was permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of the September 17, 1998 injuries and her pre-existing conditions.

Furthermore, Mr. James England, vocational expert, evaluated employee on January 3, 2003. He opined that employee's pre-existing problems, predominately fibromyalgia, combined with her work injury to render her permanently and totally disabled. Mr. England provided competent testimony that employee's pre-existing conditions impeded her employment and affected her ability to compete in the open labor market.

Employee has sustained her burden of proving Second Injury Fund liability as her testimony along with both medical and vocational experts support a finding that she is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of pre-existing disabilities and her work-related injury.

After considering the entire record, including the expert opinions of Dr. Poetz and Mr. England, we conclude that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to a combination of her pre-existing disabilities and September 17, 1998 work-related injury.

III. Future Medical Care and Treatment

The Commission agrees that employee has proven the need for ongoing medical care and treatment with regard to her bilateral knees and back condition. The need for future medical care was established as being reasonably

probable through competent, medical testimony. Dr. Maloney's records establish that employee will need ongoing treatment with regard to her knee replacements. Employee has also undergone epidural steroid injections which were recommended by Dr. Metzler to treat her chronic back condition. He also opined that he would not completely rule out the possibility of surgical referral in the future if employee's pain should become more severe or if she should develop new neurological symptoms. Therefore, we award future medical care and treatment for employee's bilateral knees and back condition.

IV. Conclusion

The Commission concludes that the competent and substantial evidence supports a finding that employer is liable for 50 % permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to bilateral knees and low back as a result of her work injury of September 17, 1998. We find employee suffered the following pre-existing disabilities: 20\% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to fibromyalgia; 12.5 % permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to the right upper extremity; and 20 % permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to the cardiovascular system. We find the combination of employee's pre-existing disabilities and her work-related injury render her permanently and totally disabled.

Employer shall pay employee permanent partial disability benefits in the weekly amount of $\ 294.73 and the Second Injury Fund shall pay the difference of $\ 38.60, beginning March 30, 2003 for 200 weeks; and thereafter, employee shall receive permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund in the weekly amount of $\ 333.33 for the remainder of her lifetime, or until as modified by law.

We award future medical care and treatment to cure and relieve employee from the residuals and effects of her injury related to her bilateral knees and back, pursuant to the provisions of section 287.140 RSMo.

As stated above, all remaining findings of fact and conclusions of law are affirmed.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Kathleen M. Hart, issued February 7, 2007, as modified, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $25^{\text {th }}$ day of July 2007.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Employee: Nancy Werner-Leible Injury No.: 98-103055
Dependents: n/aBefore the
Division of Workers’
Employer: Le Lu MetalcraftCompensation
Department of Labor and Industrial
Additional Party: Second Injury FundRelations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer: American Protection Insurance Company
Hearing Date: November 29, 2006Checked by: KMH

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: September 17, 1998
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis County
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Claimant tripped at work.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Both lower extremities a

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words