| Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION |
| FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION |
| (Modifying Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge) |
| Injury No.: 98-103055 |
| Employee: | Nancy Werner-Leible |
| Employer: | Le Lu Metalcraft |
| Insurer: | American Protection Insurance Company |
| Additional Party: | Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund |
| Date of Accident: | September 17, 1998 |
| Place and County of Accident: | St. Louis County |
| The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, subsequent to reviewing the evidence and considering the entire record, the Commission modifies the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated February 7,2007. |
| I. Preliminary Matters |
| The Commission affirms all findings and conclusions of the administrative law judge, but for the finding that employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the workinjury alone. The administrative law judge concluded that 1) employee’s back injury was medically and causally related to her work injury; 2) employee is entitled to future medical care and treatment for her knees and back; and 3) employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of her workinjury alone, and she is entitled to permanent total disability payments beginning March 30, 2005. |
| II. Second Injury Fund Liability |
| Permanent Total Disability |
| The Commission disagrees with the determination that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to the last injury in and of itself. Rather, we believe the evidence demonstrates that employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of her workinjury and pre-existing disabilities, triggering Second Injury Fund liability. |
| To trigger the liability of the Second Injury Fund, an employee must have a pre-existing permanent partial disability, whether from a compensable injury or otherwise. Section 287.220.1; "The permanent disability pre-dating the injury in question must 'exist at the time the work-related injury was sustained and be of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to employment or re-employment should the employee become unemployed.'" See also 287.220.1. To determine whether a pre-existing partial disability constitutes a hindrance or obstacle to the employee's employment, "the Commission should focus on the potential that the pre-existing injury may combine with a future work related injury to result in a greater degree of disability than would have resulted if there was no such prior condition." Liability of the Second Injury Fund is triggered only "by a finding of the presence of an actual and measurable disability at the time the work injury is sustained." |
| E. W. v. Kansas City, Missouri, School District, 89 S.W.3d 527, 537 (Mo.App. W.D. 2002), overruled on other grounds, Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. banc 2003). |
The record demonstrates that employee did suffer from actual and measurable disabilities at the time of her workrelated injury that were a hindrance or obstacle to employment. Therefore, employee is not permanently and totally disabled as a result of the work injury alone. The evidence supports a finding that employee's pre-existing disabilities combined with her work-related injury to render her permanently and totally disabled.
Employee provided testimony with regard to her pre-existing conditions. She testified that she was diagnosed with fibromyalgia several years preceding her work-related injury. She testified that her symptoms from the condition included: chronic fatigue, depression, sleep deprivation, achiness, weakness, poor grip, tenderness and difficultly raising her arm. She stated that most days she feels like she has the flu. Employee testified that she has received continuous treatment for the condition since she was diagnosed. She takes prescription medication and receives trigger point injections when she needs additional relief. Employee testified that prior to 1998 that she was having a lot of problems with sleep and depression as well as pain and fatigue. She testified that she experienced these symptoms on a daily basis. Employee also testified that she had carpal tunnel syndrome on the right and subsequently had surgery in 1983 or 1984. Following the surgery employee had a resumption of her symptoms including tingling and numbness in her right hand as well as to pain in her wrist and arm.
Employee also provided testimony regarding disabilities resulting from her work injury. She testified that she continues to experience persistent pain in her back and bilateral knees. Employee testified that she must elevate her legs for approximately half the day in order to help alleviate her knee pain. She testified that she began experiencing persistent back pain following her right total knee replacement in 2001. An MRI in November 2001 revealed a moderate central disc protrusion. Employee testified that the back pain persisted after her left total knee replacement in 2002. A second MRI in December 2003 revealed a central disc herniation with degenerative findings and facet disease. Employee testified that she continues to suffer chronic back pain for which she receives epidural steroid injections.
Employee's testimony was supported by expert opinions of Dr. Poetz and Mr. England. With regard to her workrelated injury, Dr. Poetz opined employee suffered a 50\% permanent partial disability to the lower right extremity as measured at the right knee directly resultant from the September 17, 1998 injury and a 50\% permanent partial disability to the lower left extremity as measured at the left knee directly resultant from the September 17, 1998 injury. Dr. Poetz opined employee suffered a 40\% permanent partial disability ( 30 % work-related and 10\% preexisting) rated at the spine.
Dr. Poetz provided ratings regarding employee's pre-existing conditions. He concluded employee suffered a 25\% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to fibromyalgia; a 35\% permanent partial disability to the upper right extremity as measured at the right hand and wrist; and a 20\% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole as measured at the cardiovascular system. Dr. Poetz opined employee was permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of the September 17, 1998 injuries and her pre-existing conditions.
Furthermore, Mr. James England, vocational expert, evaluated employee on January 3, 2003. He opined that employee's pre-existing problems, predominately fibromyalgia, combined with her work injury to render her permanently and totally disabled. Mr. England provided competent testimony that employee's pre-existing conditions impeded her employment and affected her ability to compete in the open labor market.
Employee has sustained her burden of proving Second Injury Fund liability as her testimony along with both medical and vocational experts support a finding that she is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of pre-existing disabilities and her work-related injury.
After considering the entire record, including the expert opinions of Dr. Poetz and Mr. England, we conclude that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to a combination of her pre-existing disabilities and September 17, 1998 work-related injury.