Elbert Hicks v. Wire Rope Corporation of America
Decision date: June 12, 20082 pages
Summary
The Commission modified the administrative law judge's award of past medical expenses, reducing the amount from $35,789.24 to $32,697.58 by excluding medical bills not supported by evidence in the record. The Commission affirmed that the employee's treatment, including an L5-S1 lumbar interbody fusion, was causally related to the work injury and that the employer/insurer failed to prove the medical expenses were unreasonable.
Caption
| Employee: | Elbert Hicks |
| Employer: | Wire Rope Corporation of America |
| Insurer: | Missouri Private Sector Individual |
| Self-Insurers Guaranty Corporation | |
| Date of Accident: | December 10, 2001 |
| Place and County of Accident: | Kansas City, Missouri |
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by $\S 287.480$ RSMo. We have reviewed the evidence, read the briefs of the parties, and considered the entire record. Pursuant to $\S 286.090$ RSMo, the Commission modifies the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated January 31, 2008.
I. Preliminary Matters
The Commission affirms all findings and conclusions of law made by the administrative law judge, but for the determination concerning the issue of past medical expenses. As to the liability of the employer/insurer, the administrative law judge awarded unpaid medical expenses of $\ 35,789.24. The Commission modifies that determination, by concluding employee is entitled to reimbursement for medical expenses in the sum of $\ 32,697.58. II. Past Medical Expenses
We disagree with the administrative law judge's determination as to unpaid medical expenses. A sufficient factual basis to award past medical expenses exists when employee identifies all of the medical bills as being related to and the product of his work related injury and the medical bills are shown to relate to the professional services rendered by medical records in evidence. Martin v. Mid-America Farm Lines, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 105 (Mo.banc 1989). When employee "presents testimony and evidence relating medical bills to an injury and places in evidence the accompanying medical bills and records, the burden of going forward with the evidence shifts to the employer or insurance carrier to prove that such medical bills were unreasonable and unfair." Esquivel v. Day's Inn, 959 S.W.2d 486, 489 (Mo.App S.D. 1998).
Employee satisfied his burden of proof with regard to the past medical expenses for treatment received from Dr. MacMillan, including the L5-S1 lumbar interbody fusion performed on June 3, 2005, as he properly offered into evidence medical bills pertaining to such treatment and testified that the medical bills and treatment were related to and the product of his work-related injury. Employer/Insurer failed to produce any evidence or testimony to establish that those medical bills were not reasonable and fair.
We agree with the unpaid medical expenses awarded by the administrative law judge from Doctors Hospital
totaling $\ 32,327.58. However, we disagree with the administrative law judge's finding that employee is entitled to expenses from: Dr. Anthony Lasalle (\$386.54); Cushing Medical (\$2,108.27 and \$28.23); Midwest Radiology (\$111.64); and Research Medical CE (\$826.98). None of these medical records are in evidence and therefore an award of medical expenses for these amounts is not supported. The total of the unsupported medical expenses is $\ 5,956.47.
Employee has demonstrated that medical bills, excluded by the administrative law judge, were medically causally related to an effort to cure and relieve the employee from the effects of the work-related injury as required by $\S 287.140$ RSMo. We find that the medical record supports a causal relationship between the work injury and medical bills for treatment received from Dr. MacMillan from October 21, 2004 through February 15, 2005 (\$370), excluding the L-S x-rays (\$110.00) taken on October 21, 2004 as those medical records are not in evidence. The total amount employee is entitled to for past medical expenses is $\ 32,697.58.
III. Conclusion
Based on the above modification, we find employer/insurer is liable to employee for past medical expenses in the amount of $\ 32,697.58.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Lisa Meiners issued January 31, 2008, as modified, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 12th day of June 2008.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
NOT SITTING
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
Secretary
Related Decisions
Carver v. Delta Innovative Services, Inc.(2011)
July 22, 2011
The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award finding that Dennis Carver sustained a compensable work-related injury on October 1, 2007, while carrying felt up a ladder, and is entitled to temporary total disability benefits and past medical expenses. The employee's compensation was subject to a maximum 50% reduction due to willful violation of safety rules, but the employer and insurers remain obligated to provide future medical treatment.
Watson-Spargo v. D & W Stateline Restaurant(2011)
July 21, 2011
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Michelle Watson-Spargo for a back injury sustained while unloading boxes at her workplace on January 16, 2009. The employee, who worked as a cook, suffered severe back pain that prevented her from ever returning to work and was complicated by multiple preexisting conditions including carpal tunnel syndrome and depression.
Whitworth v. Integram St. Louis Seating(2011)
July 20, 2011
The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award denying compensation to Timothy P. Whitworth, finding that he failed to establish the existence of an accident or occupational disease and failed to prove a causal connection between his work activities and his back condition. The employee's credibility was questioned and his claims against the Second Injury Fund were denied.
Trakas v. Angels On Duty(2011)
July 13, 2011
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of enhanced permanent partial disability benefits against the Second Injury Fund for an employee who suffered a work-related accident on August 2, 2004, that combined with preexisting cervical and lumbar spine conditions. A dissenting opinion argued the employee should have been awarded permanent total disability benefits based on her inability to compete in the open labor market given her combined injuries and preexisting conditions.
Rose v. TransWood, Inc.(2011)
July 11, 2011
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Charles Rose for a back injury sustained on March 4, 2005, while working on a cement truck. The employee was awarded permanent partial disability compensation of 12.5% body as a whole, with the Second Injury Fund holding liability for future benefits.