Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

James Karras v. Supervalu, Inc.

Decision date: May 20, 200917 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits in this case, despite finding the injury to the lumbar spine compensable under Chapter 287. The employer and insurer had previously settled their liability, resulting in no compensation being awarded to the claimant.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 04-129324
Employee:James Karras
Employer:Supervalu, Inc. (Settled)
Insurer:Old Republic Insurance Co. c/o Risk Enterprise Management, Ltd. (Settled)
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated February 4, 2009, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge John K. Ottenad, issued February 4, 2009, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 20th day of May 2009.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Employee:James KarrasInjury No.: 04-129324

Before the

Division of Workers' Compensation

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Employer: Supervalu, Inc. (Settled)

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund

Insurer: Old Republic Insurance Co.

C/O Risk Enterprise Management, Ltd. (Settled)

Hearing Date: October 17, 2008

Checked by: JKO

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No

- Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes

  1. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes

- Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: November 18, 2004

- State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis County

  1. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  2. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  3. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes

- Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes

  1. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  2. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Claimant was a forklift operator for

Employer, who injured his low back and body as a whole when he bent over to pick up a 50-pound case of napkins that had fallen.

  1. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  2. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Body as a Whole-Lumbar Spine

- Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 10 % of the Body as a Whole referable to the Lumbar Spine

  1. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 2,836.99
  2. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 2,932.61

Employee: James Karras Injury No.: 04-129324

  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? N/A

- Employee's average weekly wages: Approximately \1,013.85

  1. Weekly compensation rate: \ 675.90 for TTD/ $\ 354.05 for PPD
  2. Method wages computation: By agreement (stipulation) of the parties

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

Employer/Insurer previously settled their risk of liability in this case

  1. Second Injury Fund liability:

$\ 0.00

Total:

$\ 0.00

  1. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin immediately and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: C. Dennis Barbour.

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee:James KarrasInjury No.: 04-129324
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers'
Employer:Supervalu, Inc. (Settled)Compensation
Additional Party:Second Injury FundDepartment of Labor and Industrial <br> Relations of Missouri <br> Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Old Republic Insurance Co. <br> C/O Risk Enterprise Management, Ltd. (Settled)Checked by: JKO

On October 17, 2008, the employee, James Karras, appeared in person and by his attorney, Mr. C. Dennis Barbour, for a hearing for a final award on his claim against the Second Injury Fund. The employer, Supervalu, Inc., and its insurer, Old Republic Insurance Co. C/O Risk Enterprise Management, Ltd., were not present or represented at the hearing since they had previously settled their risk of liability in this claim. The Second Injury Fund was represented at the hearing by Assistant Attorney General Levander Smith. At the time of the hearing, the parties agreed on certain stipulated facts and identified the issues in dispute. These stipulations and the disputed issues, together with the findings of fact and rulings of law, are set forth below as follows:

STIPULATIONS:

- On or about November 18, 2004, James Karras (Claimant) sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment that resulted in injury to Claimant.

- Claimant was an employee of Supervalu, Inc. (Employer).

- Venue is proper in the City of St. Louis.

- Employer received proper notice.

- The Claim was filed within the time prescribed by the law.

- At the relevant time, Claimant earned an average weekly wage of $\ 1,013.85, resulting in applicable rates of compensation of $\ 675.90 for total disability benefits and $\ 354.05 for permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits.

- Employer paid temporary total disability (TTD) benefits in the amount of $\ 2,836.99.

- Employer paid medical benefits totaling $\ 2,932.61.

ISSUES:

- What is the nature and extent of Claimant's permanent partial and/or permanent total disability attributable to this accident?

- What is the liability of the Second Injury Fund?

EXHIBITS:

The following exhibits were admitted into evidence:

Employee Exhibits:

A Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 94-097210 between Claimant and Employer

B Medical treatment records of Missouri Orthopaedic Sports \& Trauma Clinic and Premier Care Orthopedics

C Medical treatment records of Dr. R. Evan Crandall

D Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 96-407411 between Claimant and Employer

E Medical treatment records of Parkway Orthopaedic Group, Inc.

F Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 98-141158 between Claimant and Employer

G Medical treatment records from the Supervalu medical dispensary

H Medical treatment records from Christian Hospital dated December 20, 1998

I Certified medical treatment records of Orthopedic and Sports Medicine

J MRIs and X-rays of the low back from Metro Imaging

K Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 01-164857 between Claimant and Employer

L Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 02-122791 between Claimant and Employer

M Medical report of Orthopedic Specialists

N Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 01-091730 between Claimant and Employer

O Medical treatment records of Dr. Kia Swan-Moore

P Medical treatment records of Dr. William Feinstein

Q X-ray reports of the right wrist and hand from The Imaging Center

R Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 04-059841 between

Claimant and Employer
SMedical treatment records from the Supervalu medical dispensary
TClaim for Compensation filed in Injury Number 04-129324
UStipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 04-129324 between Claimant and Employer
VMedical treatment records from the Supervalu medical dispensary
WMedical treatment records and reports from Orthopedic & Sports Medicine, Inc.
XReport from the Nerve Conduction Study performed by Dr. Russell Cantrell on March 16, 2005
YMRI report for the low back from Metro Imaging dated January 11, 2005
AAMedical treatment records of Frontier Chiropractic
BBMedical report from Metropolitan Neurology, Ltd. (Dr. Pan) dated May 24, 2005
CCCertified medical treatment records from St. Louis Labor Health Institute
DDMedical treatment records of Dr. William Sill
EEDeposition of Ms. Sherry Browning, with attachments, dated September 4, 2008
FFDeposition of Dr. Raymond Cohen, with attachments, dated December 18, 2006
GGEmployer’s certified yearly attendance records for Claimant from 2001 to 2005
*Second Injury Fund Exhibits:*
I.*Not admitted into evidence*
II.Page 20 of the deposition of James Karras dated December 6, 2006
III.Page 41 of the deposition of James Karras dated December 6, 2006
*Notes:**1) Unless otherwise specifically noted below, any objections contained in these Exhibits are overruled and the testimony fully admitted into evidence.*
*2) Some of the records submitted at hearing contain handwritten remarks or other marks on the Exhibits. All of these marks were on these records at the time they were admitted into evidence and no other marks have been added since their admission on October 17, 2008.*
*FINDINGS OF FACT:*
Based on a comprehensive review of the evidence, including Claimant’s testimony, the expert medical opinions and deposition, the vocational opinion anddeposition, the stipulations for compromise settlement, and the medical records, as well as my personal observations of Claimant at hearing, I find:
*Claimant* is a 59-year-old, currently unemployed individual, who last worked for Supervalu, Inc. (Employer) as a forkliftoperator until he took early retirement on October 29, 2005. Claimant worked for Employer for approximately 31 years, from 1974 until 2005. Although he formally retired on October 29, 2005, hisattendance records (Exhibit GG) show that he actually physically worked for Employer very few days in 2005 leading up to the time of his retirement. In his position as a forklift operator, he was responsible for driving a forklift and moving pallets and cases of products around the warehouse, andoccasionally cleaning up cases of products that spilled during their transfer. His job required extensive standing and walking, use of his arms, bending, stooping, carrying, and operating equipment. He testified that as a forklift operator he earned an hourly rate of $21.53 per hour.
*Claimant testified that his current income comes from Social Security disability of about 1,800.00 per month and a Teamsters pension of about 2,229.00 per month, as well as a Cigna benefit ofapproximately $37.80 per

month.

- Claimant testified that he attended University City High School through the eleventh grade but did not complete high school or graduate, because his parents moved to the Parkway School District, and they did not have a coop (work/study) program that would have allowed him to continue to work and attend school. He never obtained a GED and he has had no other formal education.

- In his years working for Employer, Claimant sustained numerous injuries to multiple body parts which have been the subject of medical treatment, surgeries, and Workers' Compensation settlements. (Exhibits A-S) These pre-existing injuries have resulted in Stipulations for Compromise Settlement totaling 12.5\% of the right shoulder (impingement syndrome), 25 % of the right elbow (twice-operated radial head fracture and excision of the radi

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words