On May 18, 2007, employee suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. Employee settled his claim against employer/insurer. The administrative law judge heard this matter to consider the nature and extent of permanent disability and the liability (if any) of the Second Injury Fund.
The administrative law judge determined and concluded that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to a combination of the work injury and his preexisting disabilities and conditions of ill. The administrative law judge ordered the Second Injury Fund to pay permanent total disability benefits at the rate of $\ 338.22 until employee's death. The administrative law judge also ordered the Second Injury Fund to pay $\ 34,789.31, with interest, for back payment of permanent total disability benefits for the time period December 24, 2007, through December 7, 2009.
We agree with the administrative law judge that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to a combination of his primary and preexisting injuries. We disagree, however, with the administrative law judge's findings regarding the timing and commencement of payments of permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund.
Although the statutes involving temporary total disability and permanent disability do not set out a specific time line, there is an intended timing of benefits paid by employers. Temporary total disability benefits are due from the date of the injury through the date the condition has reached the point where further progress is not expected. Courts have used various terms to determine when an employee's condition has reached the point where further progress is not expected, including the term maximum medical improvement. Vinson v. Curators of the University of Missouri, 822 S.W.2d 504, 508 (Mo. App. E.D. 1991) (interpreting a doctor's testimony of employee's maximum treatment potential to mean maximum medical improvement); Cooper, 955 S.W.2d at 575 (using the term maximum medical progress to define the point where no further progress is expected for an employee's condition).
After reaching the point where no further progress is expected, it can be determined whether there is either permanent partial or permanent total disability and benefits may be awarded based on that determination. One cannot determine the level of permanent disability associated with an injury until it reaches a point where it will no longer improve with medical treatment. Furthermore, an employers' liability for permanent partial or permanent total disability does not run concurrently with their liability for temporary total disability.
Although the term maximum medical improvement is not included in the statute, the issue of whether any further medical progress can be reached is essential in determining when a disability becomes permanent and thus, when payments for permanent partial or permanent total disability should be calculated.
Cardwell v. Treasurer of Mo., 249 S.W.3d 902, 910 (Mo. App. 2008).
The administrative law judge made no finding as to when employee reached maximum medical improvement. It appears that the administrative law judge started with the date of the work injury (May 18, 2007) and then added the number of weeks that employer paid temporary total disability benefits ( 32.29 weeks, according to the award), and concluded that December 24, 2007, was the appropriate date to commence payment of permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. This result is clearly erroneous given that employee's treatment for the primary work injury involved a cervical fusion on December 13, 2007 - employee was obviously not at maximum medical improvement for the primary injury a mere eleven days after undergoing surgery.
The records of employee's treating physician, Dr. Curtis Burton, indicate that on April 30, 2008, Dr. Burton approved employee to make a tentative return to work. Dr. Burton noted that he would see employee back in about six weeks for follow-up. Dr. Burton's treatment note for May 28, 2008, indicates that employee's restrictions could not be accommodated by the employer. Dr. Burton indicated he did not believe there was any surgery that could improve employee's condition or add much capacity to his working ability. The note indicates that Dr. Burton found employee to be at maximum medical improvement on that date. Accordingly, we conclude that employee reached maximum medical improvement on May 28, 2008. We further find that employee suffered a 25\% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole due to the primary injury. Employee would thus be entitled to permanent partial disability benefits at the rate of $\ 338.22 for 100 weeks after May 28, 2008, from the employer/insurer. Of course, employee has already settled his claim against employer/insurer, but the employer's theoretical liability is relevant for purposes of determining Second Injury Fund liability under section 287.220.1 RSMo:
[I]f the compensation for which the employer at the time of the last injury is liable is less than the compensation provided in this chapter for permanent total disability, then in addition to the compensation for which the employer is liable and after the completion of payment of the compensation by the employer, the employee shall be paid the remainder of the compensation that would be due for permanent total disability under section 287.200 out of a special fund known as the "Second Injury Fund" ...
The parties stipulated that employee's rates for permanent partial and permanent total disability benefits are equal at $\ 338.22 per week. Because the rates for permanent partial and permanent total disability are equal, the differential rate for which the Second Injury Fund would otherwise be liable for 100 weeks under the foregoing section is $\ 0. After 100 weeks, the employer's theoretical payments of compensation for the primary injury are completed, and the Second Injury Fund is
| Injury No.: 07-115368 |
| Employee: Roy W. Gutting |
| - 3 - |
| then responsible for the remainder of compensation due for permanent total disability. The appropriate date for commencement of permanent total disability payments from the Second Injury Fund is thus 100 weeks after the date of maximum medical improvement, or April 28, 2010. On that date, permanent total disability benefits will commence from the Second Injury Fund at the rate of $338.22 per week. |
| Conclusion |
| The Commission supplements the award of the administrative law judge as to the date of maximum medical improvement, and modifies that portion of the award relating to the commencement of permanent total disability payments from the Second Injury Fund. |
| The Second Injury Fund is ordered to pay to employee permanent total disability benefits at the rate of $338.22 per week, beginning April 29, 2010, and continuing thereafter for employee’s lifetime, or until modified by law. |
| The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge’s allowance of attorney’s fees herein as being fair and reasonable. |
| All remaining findings of fact and conclusions of law are affirmed. |
| Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law. |
| The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Henry T. Herschel issued March 19, 2010, is attached and incorporated by this reference to the extent it is not inconsistent with our findings, conclusions, award, and decision herein. |
| Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 29th day of October 2010. |
| LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION |
| William F. Ringer, Chairman |
| Alice A. Bartlett, Member |
| John J. Hickey, Member |
| Attest: |
| Secretary |