Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

James Toebben v. Fred Weber Construction

Decision date: November 4, 201020 pages

Summary

The Commission reversed the Administrative Law Judge's denial of Second Injury Fund liability, finding that the employee's permanent total disability resulted from the combined effect of a pre-existing back injury from a Vietnam landmine accident and a work-related injury sustained on October 25, 2005. The case involved determining whether the work injury, combined with pre-existing disabilities including a prior finger amputation and bilateral hand arthritis, created a greater degree of permanent disability warranting Second Injury Fund compensation.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Reversing Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Employee:James Toebben
Employer:Fred Weber Construction (Settled)
Insurer:Self-Insured (Settled)
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. We have reviewed the evidence, read the parties’briefs, and considered the whole record. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission reverses the award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Kevin Dinwiddie dated March 16, 2010.
Preliminaries
On October 25, 2005, employee suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. Employee settled his claim against employer/insurer. The administrative law judge heard this matter to consider the nature and extent of permanent disability and the liability (if any) of the Second Injury Fund.The administrative law judge found that employee sustained permanent partial disability as a result of the October 25, 2005, work injury, but also found that employee was already permanently and totally disabled due to a pre-existing back injury. The administrative law judge concluded that employee failed to prove that permanent disability from the work injury combined with any prior permanent disabilities to create a greater degree of permanent disability. Given these findings and conclusions, the administrative law judge denied employee’s claim against the Second Injury Fund.Employee filed an Application for Review with the Commission alleging that the administrative law judge’s award is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Employee argues that he was permanently and totally disabled due to the combined effect of his pre-existing disabilities and the October 25, 2005, work injury.The issues currently before the Commission are the nature and extent of permanent disability and the liability of the Second Injury Fund.
Findings of Fact
Preexisting conditions
Employee was sixty years old at the time of the hearing before the administrative law judge. Employee finished high school but has no further education or training. Employee served three years in the military as a combat engineer. He ran over a landmine in Vietnam and injured his back. After he was honorably discharged from the military, employee worked for Missouri Limestone Incorporated until 1983. In March 1983, employee went to work for employer, a quarry and processing enterprise that

produces commercial rock for heavy construction projects. Employee worked for employer until January 2007. Employee's last position for employer was plant maintenance man. Employee's duties involved keeping plant machinery in good working order. This was physically demanding work which involved replacing heavy machine parts on a daily basis, welding, hammering stuck parts with sledgehammers, carrying heavy tools and equipment, operating pneumatic tools, working frequently above shoulder level, and contorting into awkward positions to reach confined spaces in the machinery.

In 1980, employee injured his left ring finger when it was caught in a conveyor belt at work. Employee was hospitalized for 27 days and the finger was amputated above the proximal interphalangeal joint. As a result of the 1980 left finger injury, employee is unable to carry small objects and has difficulty grasping items with his left hand.

Beginning in 1997, employee sought medical treatment for bilateral hand complaints. The nature of employee's work involved his hands in frequent high-impact activities. In March 2004, employee saw Dr. James Schaberg, who diagnosed advanced arthritis in both hands and prescribed medication. In May 2004, employee saw a hand surgeon, Dr. Subbarao Polineni, who treated employee with injection therapy and the use of splints. In August 2005, Dr. Polineni performed an arthroplasty of the right index finger at the metacarpophalangeal joint; in 2008 employee underwent a similar procedure for the left hand. Surgery improved the pain in employee's hands, but they remained stiff and were painful with increased use. Employee's fine motor skills also remained poor following surgery and employee had trouble grasping objects and frequently dropped tools at work.

In 2003, employee was diagnosed with avascular necrosis when he sought treatment for intermittent sharp pains in his right hip. Employee ultimately underwent a right hip replacement performed by Dr. James Schaberg. Employee's hip pain improved after surgery but he experienced stiffness and a diminished capacity to stand, sit, and walk. Employee was able to continue performing his usual duties at work, but he had to slow down and adapt to his right hip condition, especially when walking up and down stairs. Employee frequently climbed stairs at work and occasionally even had to run up the stairs to attend to malfunctioning machinery.

On January 28, 2005, employee injured his right shoulder when he was pulling on a beam at work. Employee saw Dr. Mitchell Rotman, who diagnosed a massive tear of the right rotator cuff. Dr. Rotman performed a surgical repair on March 18, 2005. Employee was released for full duty on September 13, 2005. After he was released for full duty, employee was able to complete his work tasks, but he experienced increased difficulty due to ongoing pain and discomfort in his right shoulder. After the injury to his right shoulder, employee relied heavily on his left shoulder to perform duties such as sweeping, welding, changing screens, and carrying items. Employee also occasionally asked for help from other workers to complete his tasks. Dr. Rotman performed a second surgery on May 19, 2006, to repair a re-torn rotator cuff.

Beginning in 1993, employee sought medical treatment for low back pain with occasional sharp shooting pains into his right leg. Employee saw a chiropractor and received ice pack, hot pads, and electrical stimulation treatments for thirteen years. Employee also saw his

primary care physician and an orthopedic specialist. In 2005, x-rays revealed degenerative disc disease at L5-S1. Treatment was conservative with medication and exercises. An MRI on January 13, 2006, revealed multi-level degenerative changes with central canal stenosis. On February 7, 2006, employee's orthopedic doctor sent him to Dr. Stanley Martin, a neurosurgeon, for evaluation based on employee's continuing complaints of low back pain. After additional evaluation including x-rays and another MRI, Dr. Martin diagnosed chronic low back pain without neurological involvement. Dr. Martin determined that employee was not a surgical candidate for his back condition.

Employee was able to perform his work duties despite his back pain, although he occasionally had to lie down after heavy work. If employee was doing particularly heavy work, he might lie down five or six times in one day. Other days, he would not have to lie down at all. Employee's back pain interfered with his ability to stand, sit, and walk for long periods of time. Going up and down the stairs at work caused his back to hurt a lot. Toward the end of his employment with employer, employee had to ask people to assist him with his work due to his back pain, but employee was always able to do the job if he needed to. Employee's back pain has been better since he has been off work; employee is still sore but he does not experience the throbbing and stabbing pains like before. Employee's functional limitations, however, are approximately the same as when he was working: employee still has difficulty walking, sitting, and standing for prolonged periods due to low back discomfort.

The primary injury

On October 25, 2005, employee was changing a heavy screen at work when he injured his left shoulder. Employee was diagnosed with bursitis, severe tendinopathy of the rotator cuff, and partial biceps tear. Dr. Rotman performed a left shoulder arthroscopy, limited debridement and subacromial decompression on October 13, 2006. Dr. Rotman found employee to have reached maximum medical improvement for the left shoulder on January 9, 2007. Employee experienced a number of problems performing his work following the left shoulder injury and surgery. Employee was unable to complete tasks that he had been able to perform before. Employee was unable to change screens, weld, work above shoulder level, or use sledgehammers like he used to. Employee needed the help of coworkers to perform these tasks. Employee frequently dropped things due to left shoulder weakness. Employee also had trouble sweeping and using pneumatic tools.

In January 2007, employer gave employee the option of running the high-lift machine. Employer was downsizing and offered employee this option because of his seniority with the company. Running the high-lift was lighter duty than the tasks usually involved in employee's work, in that it did not involve constant lifting, hammering, or climbing stairs. Employee was only able to run the high-lift for approximately two hours before his physical limitations prevented him from continuing. Employee could not keep his arms extended to run the controls due to his bilateral shoulder conditions. Specifically, employee's left shoulder limitations interfered with his ability to keep his left arm extended, with the effect that employee was unable to keep his left hand on the gear shifts and appropriate buttons. Employee's bilateral hand problems also interfered with his ability to grasp and operate the steering wheel and levers. Employee's back pain was aggravated by the high-lift machine bouncing up and down as employee drove it across the yard. Employee ultimately retired on January 31, 2007 because he felt that his physical limitations following the left shoulder injury rendered him unable to perform his duties.

Expert medical evidence

Dr. Jerry Meyers examined employee for purposes of an independent medical evaluation on August 28, 2007. Dr. Meyers' evaluation revealed pain in the right shoulder with both active and passive motion in all ranges and crepitus with abduction to 90 degrees; decrease in right biceps strength; general weakness of the entire right shoulder girdle; left shoulder pain with all motions; tenderness with spasms across the low back; back pain present in all motions; arthritic changes with diffuse swelling in the fingers of each hand; decreased grip strength in both hands; and decreased range of motion in the right hip.

Dr. Meyers opined that employee suffers a 45\% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole attributable to the back and an additional 35\% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to the right hip. Dr. Meyers noted that employee is not a surgical candidate with regard to his back condition. Dr. Meyers opined that employee suffers permanent partial disability of 45 % of the right hand and 40 % of the left hand referable to his arthritis and surgeries. With regard to the shoulders, Dr. Meyers opined that employee suffers a permanent partial disability of 40 % of the right shoulder, and 25 % of the left shoulder due to the primary injury. Dr. Meyers issued the following restrictions for employee: no heavy or repeated lifting, bending, squatting, grasping, pushing, pulling, or working at or above shoulder level without rest intervals; avoid periods of repetitive arm movements; no lifting over 15 pounds or as tolerated; no working around vibrating machinery; avoid or limit work involving fine motor skills which aggravate the arthritis in employee's hands; avoid walking on uneven surfaces and stairs; avoid prolonged walking, sitting, or standing; and avoid remaining in a fixed position. Dr. Meyers opined that employee should be allo

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words