The parties agreed at the final hearing that there were disputes on the following issues: ${ }^{2}$
- Whether on or about October 31, 2004, October 6, 2005, and November 27, 2006, Claimant sustained injuries by accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment for Employer.
- Mr. Baldwin states that the stipulation regarding temporary total disability is incorrect inasmuch as he was paid for one week of temporary total disability in the amount of $\ 532.51 from the injury sustained in 2004. A copy of his check is attached.
- Mr. Baldwin is seeking present and future medical inasmuch as HD refused to provide him treatment. He currently is pursuing treatment in Chicago with a urologist there.
Attached to the email was a copy of a check from CNA Insurance dated 11/8/04 in the amount of $\ 532.51 that references " 1 wk of TTD", and a copy of a medical record dated 10-25-05. The August 6, 2010 email, and August 6, 2010 letter, with referenced check and medical record have been marked, "Court's Exhibit 1."
${ }^{2}$ Claimant's proposed Award filed on July 9, 2010 identified the following issues to determine:
- Whether Claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of employment?
- Whether the statute of limitations has run on the 2004 and 2005 claims?
- The nature and extent of Claimant's temporary total and permanent partial disability relating to any of the claims filed.
Claimant's amended proposed Award filed on July 27, 2010 identified the following issues to determine:
- Whether Claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of employment?
- Whether the statute of limitations has run on the 2004 and 2005 claims, or whether such injuries are repetive [sic.]
- The nature and extent of Claimant's temporary total and permanent partial disability relating to any of the claims filed.
- Whether Claimant's current condition is medically causally related to the alleged work injuries of October 31, 2004, October 6, 2005, and November 27, 2006.
- Employer's liability for permanent partial disability benefits, including nature and extent of permanent partial disability.
- Whether Claimant's claims in Injury Numbers 04-114314 and 05-102617 were filed within the time prescribed by law and are barred by the statute of limitations.
Claimant testified in person. In addition, Claimant offered the following exhibits which were admitted in evidence without objection:
A-Dr. Douglas Rope report
B-Employer's medical Records
C- Employer's medical Records
D- Medical Records
E- Medical Records
F- Report of Injury for 2004 claim
G- Report of Injury for 2005 claim
H- Report of Injury for 2006 claim
I-Comparison of Tanks
J-Employee Incident Report
Employer offered the following exhibits which were admitted in evidence without objection:
1-Disability Insurance Application
2-Outpatient Admission
3-Gill Wright, M.D. Progress Note
4-James Carter, M.D. Progress Note
5-Internet Research "Causes"
The parties offered Joint Exhibit 1, copies of Workers' Compensation Reports of Injury, Claims for Compensation, and Answers to Claims for Compensation, which was admitted in evidence without objection.
Any objections not expressly ruled on during the hearing or otherwise in this award are now overruled. To the extent there are marks, tabs or highlights contained in the exhibits, those markings were made prior to being made part of the record, and were not placed thereon by the Administrative Law Judge.
A record was made at the April 23, 2010 hearing that Claimant's case in Injury Number 07-134329 was co