Employee: Danny Andrews
Injury No.: 00-175171
his right hip. The surgical report indicates the use of significant hardware, including a rod, multiple screws, plates, and wiring. See England deposition, Exhibit F.
On February 1, 2001, Dr. Dunitz performed a revision of intramedullary rodding with removal of existing hardware and insertion of new hardware with a larger rod, because the femur had not fused. See England deposition, Exhibits D, E. The second surgery resulted in a nonfusion. Although the medical providers considered a third surgery, the surgery was not performed due to risks imposed by the claimant's irregular heartbeat.
Since the September 2000 accidental injury, the claimant has not worked and testified that he has considerable limitations due to his hip and leg. He testified that walking, standing, and climbing steps increase hip and leg pain. Walking on uneven surfaces causes pain. He testified that his hip and leg experience numbness at times. He testified that he cannot stand for six hours per day. He testified that he does not lift anything heavy. The heaviest object he lifts is a bag of dog food, weighing up to forty pounds, and he does that very infrequently. He walks to his mailbox and back, and he walks the dog a couple of times per day for a very short distance. He gets no more than six hours of sleep per night. Before the injury, he would sleep eight to ten hours. He cannot climb stairs without pain and it wears him out. He can drive for two hours then he must stop to get out and move around. He cannot sit for prolonged periods of time. He experiences popping in his hip. He has trouble keeping his balance. He cannot squat. His pain ranges from a five to eight out of ten on a daily basis. Weather changes increases his symptoms. His right leg is three to four centimeters shorter than his left leg. He walks with a cane and has a pair of shoes with a lift, but the lift does not help with his limitations.
The claimant is a high school graduate who was employed from 1969 to 2000 as a heavy equipment operator for this employer. The claimant's prior employment was working for the Oklahoma Highway Department on a survey crew for three to four years, working for Aalco Construction for a few weeks and working in high school on a family farm. The claimant also held a few limited side jobs over the years, hauling hay, working at a filling station pumping gas and changing tires and doing labor work for his brothers flooring company. The claimant does not use a computer, the internet, or text on a phone. He testified that all his past employment has been labor related to operating heavy equipment. He has not looked for work after his injury.
The claimant was treated for a heart condition in the 1980's and was on medication for a year and a half. The medication was no longer prescribed when his cardiac reports improved. He has no restrictions related to his heart.
On October 23, 2003, the Social Security Administration prepared a functional assessment based on a review of a medical report by a medical consultant/evaluator, Dr. Kurella, which is not in evidence. This evaluation placed various exertional restrictions on the claimant: (1) lifting restrictions of twenty pounds occasionally, ten pounds frequently, and (2) sitting, standing, or walking six hours per day, (3) climbing, balancing, kneeling, and crawling frequently, and (4) stooping and crouching occasionally. See England deposition, Exhibit H.