Frank Pappageorge v. Tim Cason Construction

^{1} Statutory references are to the Revised Statutes of Missouri 2008 unless otherwise indicated.

The Court in Martin v. Mid-America Farm Lines, 769 S.W.2d 105 (Mo. 1989), held that when a claimant credibly testifies that his/her visits to hospitals and various doctors were the product of a work injury and provides medical bills identified as being related to and the product of said injury, and when the bills relate to the professional services rendered as shown by the medical records in evidence, a sufficient factual basis exists for the Commission to award compensation. Id. at 111-12. The Court noted, however, that the employer (or Second Injury Fund in this case) may challenge the reasonableness or fairness of these bills or may show that the medical expenses incurred were not related to the injury in question. Id.

[^0]

[^0]: ${ }^{2} This \ 221,661.16 represents the only medical expenses for which the ALJ awarded reimbursement. It is worth noting that the medical bills offered by employee showed that he actually incurred $\ 227,579.16 of medical expenses with the University of Kansas Medical Center, but $\ 5,918.00 of said expenses were written off, transferred, or reduced by the institution.

${ }^{3} The medical bills offered by employee show that he incurred \ 42,769.00 of medical expenses with the University of Kansas Physicians. However, the University of Kansas Physicians only claimed \$42,684.00 in its Application for Direct Payment.

In this case, we find, as did the ALJ, that employee "credibly detailed the mechanism of his injury and provided credible evidence of his medical treatment to cure and relieve the effects of those injuries." In addition, we find that employee provided medical bills reflecting the treatment received and credibly testified that the medical bills do, in fact, relate to and are the product of the work-related injury. We further find that the Second Injury Fund did not challenge the reasonableness or fairness of the bills or show that the medical expenses incurred were not related to the injury in question.

Based upon the aforementioned, we find that employee shall be awarded reimbursement for the sum total of all of the medical expenses outlined under the heading "Total on Bills" in the aforementioned table, with the exception of the expenses incurred with the University of Kansas Physicians, for which we find that employee shall be awarded the amount requested by the University of Kansas Physicians in its Application for Direct Payment, $\ 42,684.00.

We award employee additional medical expenses from the Second Injury Fund in the amount of $\ 51,058.58.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Mark S. Siedlik, issued February 17, 2012, as modified, is attached hereto, and its findings and conclusions are incorporated to the extent they are not inconsistent with our findings and conclusions herein.

The Commission further approves and affirms the ALJ's allowance of attorney's fee as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $26^{\text {th }}$ day of July 2012.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

V A C A N T

Chairman

James Avery, Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

Employee: Frank Pappageorge

Injury No. 09-070259

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Tim Cason Construction

Insurer: Uninsured

Additional Party: Missouri Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: November 15, 2011

Checked by: MSS/lh

1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: August 3, 2009.
5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Johnson County, Missouri.
6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
9. Was Claim for Compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
10. Was employer insured by above insurer? No.
11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: While in the course and scope of employee's work, employee fell injuring his hip.
12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No. Date of death? N/A
13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Back and body as a whole.
14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 35 percent whole body.
15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: -0-

Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee: Frank Pappageorge

Injury No. 09-070259

1. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? -0-
2. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? \221,661.16
3. Employee's average weekly wages: \ 300
4. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 200
5. Method wages computation: Evidence at trial.

1. Second Injury Fund liability: Medical expenses of $\ 221,661.16
2. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin as of the date of the award and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 percent of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: Jason Osteen

Employee: Frank Pappageorge

Injury No. 09-070259

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Tim Cason Construction

Insurer: Uninsured

Additional Party: Missouri Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: November 15, 2011

Checked by: MSS/lh

This case comes on for hearing before Administrative Law Judge Siedlik in Clinton, Missouri, on November 15, 2011. The Claimant Frank Pappageorge was present with his counsel Mr. Jason Osteen. The Second Injury Fund was represented by their counsel, Ms. Laura Van Fleet. The University of Kansas and Kansas University of Physicians were represented by their counsel Mr. Scott Gardner and Ms. Jennifer Smith.

This case involves injuries on or about August 3, 2009, while the Claimant was in the employ of Tim Cason Construction and sustained injuries by accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment in Johnson County, Missouri. At the time of the injuries the parties were subject to the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law and the Employer's liability uninsured. The Employer had notice of an injury and a claim was timely filed. There have been no weekly benefits or medical expenses paid to date.

The issues to be resolved include:

1) Whether the accident arose out of and in the course and scope of employment;

2) The liability for past medical expenses; and,

3) The entitlement to a medical lien of the University of Kansas and the Kansas University Physicians.

The evidence of trial consisted of the testimony of Claimant and David Geiss in person, together with Claimant's Exhibits A through E and Second Injury Fund Exhibit No. 1.

The Claimant testified on August 3, 2009, he was an employee of Tim Cason Construction and while so employed worked as a home remodeler on jobs contracted by Mr. Cason. The Claimant described various duties, including trash removal, dry wall hanging and painting as part of his assigned duties. The Claimant testified he worked for no other employer than Tim Cason Construction. The Claimant was paid by the Employer and indicated he was paid weekly although from time to time the Claimant was paid late. The Claimant provided one check stub (Claimant's Exhibit D) from Tim Cason Construction for a net weekly pay of $\ 300. Claimant testified he received neither a 1099 nor W2 from

Tim Cason Construction. The Claimant testified while so employed for Mr. Cason the Claimant on a construction site slipped and fell while scraping floors injuring his hip. The Claimant was provided conservative treatment and ultimately ended up having five surgical procedures in an eight-week period. The Claimant detailed these surgical procedures to his hip involving initial surgical treatment of the right hip injury with subsequent infections and further surgical interventions ultimately resulting in a total hip replacement on April 1, 2010.

The Claimant testified the hip still causes considerable pain and the Claimant cannot sit for any length of time indicating 40 minutes is the longest that Claimant can comfortably sit. The Claimant then indicated he must stand for a period of time to relieve his discomfort. Claimant testified he was told by Mr. Cason that Mr.