(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
**Injury No.:** 13-012655
**Employee:** Sondra Denomy
**Employer:** Francis Howell R-III School District
**Insurer:** Missouri United School Insurance Council
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated April 3, 2019. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Margaret D. Landolt, issued April 3, 2019, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this **24th** day of October 2019.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Robert W. Cornejo, Chairman
DISSENTING OPINION FILED
Reid K. Forrester, Member
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Attest:
Secretary
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Improved Health
Im
Injury No.: 13-012655
Employee: Sondra Denomy
-2-
conclusion that "claimant consistently complained of hip pain after the injury"¹ is a fallacy. There were no complaints to Mercy of right hip pain nor to Dr. Krause. On May 10, 2013, employee told Dr. Volarich she noted a shooting pain in her right hip. However, Dr. Volarich noted full motion and no groin pain over the hip joint. The administrative law judge cited a December 19, 2013, notation where employee told Dr. Peter she had pain in her low back shooting down to her groin area. These are one, perhaps two, arguable complaints to employee's hip out of multiple visits to others doctors. The administrative law judges' findings that employee consistently complained of hip pain after the injury are simply not supported by the evidence in the record. The administrative law judge's conclusion that possibly two complaints to the right hip equates to a diagnosis of labral tear is unrealistic and inaccurate.
The administrative law judge erred in rejecting Dr. Frisella's opinion that the labral tear in employee's right hip was not causally related to employee's work injury. Dr. Frisella's opinion did not lack a factual foundation because Dr. Frisella had Dr. Volarich's May 10, 2013 independent medical examination report with employee's history and complaints. Dr. Frisella noted that this report showed a normal right hip exam and that Dr. Volarich gave no diagnosis to employee's right hip. Dr. Frisella opined that a labral tear would have manifested itself at this time as loss of motion or pain in the hip. A note from Dr. Quigley's office dated September 10, 2013, documented "Physical Exam: hip is normal."² The administrative law judge ignored eight reasons Dr. Frisella gave why employee's March 1, 2013, injury was not the prevailing factor causing any diagnosis in employee's right hip.
Dr. Frisella accurately advised that employee had Cam impingement, which is abnormal touching of the bony structures of the hip, that this abnormal touching is the cause of employee's labral tear and not the result of an acute injury.
The administrative law judge erred in rejecting the findings and opinions of Dr. Jessee Crane, Dr. Krause, Dr. Volarich, Dr. Peter, Dr. Quigley, and Dr. Frisella. Her decision is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the competent and substantial evidence in that she finds the opinion of Dr. Dwight Woiteshek, who examined the employee over three years after the work accident, more persuasive than the treating physicians who examined the employee at or near the time of the injury.
Past Medical Bills
Employee failed to sustain her burden of proof with regard to medical bills for treatment to her right knee and hip.
Employer provided medical treatment to employee's right ankle, the only condition related to her March 1, 2013, injury. Because employee failed to prove that her right knee and right hip conditions were medically causally related to the injury, medical bills that flowed from those conditions are not compensable.
1 Award, p. 10.
2 Transcript, 177.
Enployee: Sondra Denomy
-3-
Injury No.: 13-012655
The administrative law judge conceded that there was no evidence presented at hearing that employee made a specific demand for additional medical treatment. On her own, the administrative law judge took administrative notice of the Division of Workers' Compensation files. This is yet another example of how the administrative law judge ignored the evidence and reached outside the hearing record to find her own evidence.
**Past Temporary Total Disability Benefits**
Employee is not entitled to past temporary total benefits because employee was off work for surgeries to her right knee and right hip because, as explained *supra*, those conditions were not related to employee's March 1, 2013 injury.
**Nature and Extent of Permanent Partial Disability**
The administrative law judge erred in awarding employee permanent partial disability of 20% of the right hip, 25% of the right knee, and 10% of the right ankle.
Dr. Krause, employee's treating physician, found zero percent permanent partial disability from the March 1, 2013, injury. Dr. Frisella, employer's examining physician, found zero percent permanent partial disability to employee's right hip. Dr. Woiteshek, employee's examining physician, found 35% permanent partial disability to the right hip, 35% permanent partial disability to employee right knee, and 20% permanent partial disability to employee's right ankle.
The employee returned to work and continues to work without any restrictions attributable to the March 1, 2013 injury. She testified at hearing that she had no problems related to her right ankle, right knee, or right hip and that her only complaint involved the right thigh. No evidence supports the administrative law judge's conclusion that employee experiences problems with lifting, twisting, kneeling, squatting, climbing, reaching, bending and carrying.
**Conclusion**
There has been a serious miscarriage of justice against the employer and insurer in this case. The administrative law judge's award should be reversed in its entirety. I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision finding otherwise.
Reid K. Forrester, Member
*Award, 11.*