| FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion) |
| Injury No.: 05-080783 |
| Employee: | Jennifer Thomas |
| Employer: | Forsyth Care Center |
| Insurer: | Missouri Nursing Home Insurance |
| This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having read the briefs, reviewed the evidence, and considered the whole record, we find that the award of the administrative law judge allowing compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge with this supplemental opinion. |
| Discussion Employer’s failure to comply with the temporary award On December 10, 2007, the administrative law judge issued a Temporary or Partial Award ordering employer to provide medical care “as may be authorized and directed by Diane Cornelison, D.O., and which is reasonable, necessary, and causally related to the accident.”Temporary Award, page 12. But thereafter, employer failed to pay for treatments ordered by Dr. Cornelison. Specifically, employer failed to pay for or authorize nerve blocks, epidural injections, physical therapy, a repeat CT myelogram, aquatherapy, and pain medications, despite Dr. Cornelison’s making clear in her treatment notes both her repeated recommendations and her inability to obtain authorizations from employer.As a result of employer’s failure to comply with the temporary award, employee was unable to obtain many of the treatments recommended by Dr. Cornelison, as she had no insurance and no way to pay for medical expenses. Employer’s conduct ultimately caused employee to suffer a worse medical outcome, as Dr. Schaffer credibly opined that employee’s “prognosis and treatment could have been facilitated if she had been seen sooner by an orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon.”Transcript, page 896. Given these circumstances, we find employer’s choice to disregard the temporary award to be particularly egregious.On appeal before this Commission, employee asks that we apply § 287.510 RSMo and double (1) the amount of temporary total disability benefits both paid and unpaid by employer, (2) the amount of medical expenses paid by the employer, and (3) the amount of permanent total disability benefits owed from May 13, 2009, to the date of the final award. In the case ofBall-Sawyers v. Blue Springs Sch. Dist., 286 S.W.3d 247 (Mo. App. 2009), the court determined that the 2005 amendments to § 287.510 RSMo are retroactively applicable to injuries, such as the one at issue herein, that occurred before the effective date of the amendments.Id. at 257. Section 287.510, as amended in 2005, provides as follows: |
In any case a temporary or partial award of compensation may be made, and the same may be modified from time to time to meet the needs of the case, and the same may be kept open until a final award can be made, and if the same be not complied with, the amount equal to the value of compensation ordered and unpaid may be doubled in the final award, if the final award shall be in accordance with the temporary or partial award.
The Ball-Sawyers court interpreted the words "ordered and unpaid" in the foregoing section as providing the Commission with discretion to double only the amount of compensation that is ordered in a temporary award and which remains unpaid by the employer as of the date of a final hearing. 286 S.W.3d at 256-57. Clearly then, under Ball-Sawyers, we cannot double the amounts that employer paid to employee, nor can we double any amount that was not ordered by the administrative law judge, such as temporary total ${ }^{1}$ or permanent total disability benefits. Rather, the only amount in this case subject to doubling under Ball-Sawyers and the amended version of $\S 287.510$ is the value of the medical care that the administrative law judge ordered and that the employer has refused to provide as of the date of the final hearing.
We would be inclined to order such a doubling in this case. But we are unable to do so on this record, because employee failed to prove the value of compensation ordered and unpaid. Employee failed to put any of her medical bills into evidence, or any other evidence (such as testimony from her medical experts) to establish the dollar value of the medical treatments which she was unable to obtain owing to employer's conduct. Absent such evidence, there is no basis for this Commission to calculate the appropriate amount of the penalty under $\S 287.510$.
With that said, we condemn employer's refusal to comply with the administrative law judge's temporary award. We note that employer offers no explanation, in its brief filed with this Commission, for its failure to authorize the treatments recommended by Dr. Cornelison. Employer asserts that it provided a neurosurgical consultation for employee with Dr. Reintjes on May 15, 2008. But employer fails to explain why it did not authorize the nerve blocks, epidural injections, physical therapy, a repeat CT myelogram, aquatherapy, and pain medications, all of which were recommended by Dr. Cornelison as necessary in connection with employee's work injury, and all of which fell inarguably within employer's obligations under the temporary award. From December 10, 2007, the date of the administrative law judge's temporary award, until Dr. Cornelison last saw employee on May 12, 2009, employer failed to authorize any of these treatments, and even stopped authorizing the medications Dr. Cornelison prescribed for employee's intractable low back pain. Employer advances no explanation for what appears from this record to be an attitude of brazen indifference toward its obligations to employee under the administrative law judge's award.
[^0]
[^0]: ${ }^{1}$ In his temporary award, the administrative law judge did not find employee was temporarily and totally disabled, nor did he order employer to pay temporary total disability benefits to employee, but instead merely noted a stipulation by the parties that employer was paying temporary total disability benefits as of the date of hearing. Section 287.510 only permits doubling of "compensation ordered and unpaid" (emphasis added).
Of course, "employer's reasons for nonpayment are irrelevant," Shaw v. Scott, 49 S.W.3d 720, 726 (Mo. App. 2001), and we would award a doubling of the unpaid past medical expenses regardless of employer's reasons-if this record provided evidence sufficient to permit us to do so. Because it does not, we must reluctantly deny employee's request for a doubling under $\S 287.510$ of her unpaid past medical expenses.