For Second Injury Fund liability for permanent and total disability to exist, the previous disability and the last injury must combine together to result in permanent and total disability. V.A.M.S. § 287.2201, subd. 1. Mr. Scott is permanently and totally disabled as a result of his previous disabilities alone, and was not employable on the open labor market at the time of his 2008 and 2009 work injuries, in spite of working. His numerous disabilities pre-existing his 2008 work injury are outlined:
Mr. Scott tore his right rotator cuff in 1998. Dr. Koprivica noted disability from this injury in regard to climbing and using his right shoulder.
Mr. Scott fell 22 feet in 2001 which shattered bones in his leg and feet. He spent two years with his leg in a CAM walker. This injury significantly limited his walking and he still has considerable problems from his this injury to his lower extremities. Mr. Scott reported after this 2001 right leg injury he had a very difficult time getting on and off machinery and only maintained employment by being self employed. He was able to put the brunt of the work on his employees and participate only by overseeing the work. Mr. Scott saw Dr. Bellamy from St. Luke's Medical on March 29, 2007. Dr. Bellamy recorded at that visit that Gary reported not being able to walk even 50 feet without having to stop and rest because of the discomfort. Dr. Koprivica suggested restrictions based on Mr. Scott's lower extremity disability: limit walking and standing to 15 minutes and avoid climbing.
He also has a history of major hearing problems which require cochlear implants. The hearing problems date back as far as middle school. He dropped out of school because he could
not hear the teacher. He reads very little and cannot operate a computer making it difficult for him to do tasks related to operating an excavating business.
In 2007, Mr. Scott had several hernias. Mr. Scott (Exhibit 1, 22-24) reported that he never recovered from his hernias and that Dr. Scott, his primary care physician, told him to stop working and that he had to quit working.
Mr. Dreiling testified that Mr. Scott was "at a very distinct disadvantage" in competing for training and supervisory jobs for another company considering his hearing, communication skills and educational background. When the severe pain, and physical restrictions he faced from his lower extremity injuries, his hernias, and his first shoulder injury, it is clear that the only reason Mr. Scott was able to work was because he was majorly self-accommodating as a business owner. Until his retirement, Mr. Scott did continue to earn an income because he owned his own business, but only because he made major accommodations for himself regarding what equipment he would operate, and relying on his wives to perform more intellectually demanding tasks. Mr. Dreiling agreed that Mr. Scott would not have the availability of self-accommodation in the open labor market like he did in his own business and that no jobs exist in the open labor market that would let him simply show other employees how to operate equipment without performing some work himself. (Exhibit B, 37). The Second Injury Fund is not liable for Mr. Scott's 2008 and 2009 work injuries as his permanent and total disability arises based on his injuries that pre-date 2008.
Angus does not apply in this case, even though there is only one expert report submitted into evidence. Angus v. Second Injury Fund, 328 S.W.3d 294 (Mo. App. W.D. 2010). Angus specifically states "that the commission may not substitute an administrative law judge's personal opinion on the question of medical causation of [an injury] for the uncontradicted testimony of a qualified medical expert." Id. at 300. An expert's opinion may be contradicted by his own testimony. Carkeek v. Treasurer, 352 S.W.3d 604, 610 (Mo. App. W.D. 2011). "Extent of disability. . . is not so medically technical as to remove it from the expertise that is attributed to the Commission. The question whether a claimant is totally and permanently disabled is not exclusively a medical question." Id. at 610, citing Crum v. Sachs Elec., 769 S.W.2d 131, 136 (Mo. App. W.D. 1989). The current case focuses on causation of disability while Angus centered on medical causation of an injury. Angus, 328 S.W.3d 294 at 300.
The Court can properly determine that the cause for permanent and total disability was Mr. Scott's pre-existing problems. First, because nature and extent of disability is at issue, and not medical causation, the Court is free to look to the whole record and not just to the medical expert in the case. Nature and extent of disability is a separate issue from medical causation and extent of disability is not medically technical. Carkeek, 352 S.W.3d at 610. Second, according to Mr. Scott's testimony, at least one doctor asked him to stop working when he began having hernias in 2007. Third, because the issue in this case is not medical causation of an injury, it is appropriate for the Court to make findings of fact regarding Mr. Scott's abilities and disability before the last accident. Carkeek, 352 S.W.3d at 610. As outlined above, Mr. Scott's hearing problems since childhood, his extremely limited ability to walk due to foot injuries, problems
from his first shoulder injury, and the pain and lifting limitations associated with his hernias, Mr. Scott was clearly permanently and totally disabled before 2008 and as such unemployable on the open labor market.
I find therefore, the Second Injury Fund has no liability to the Claimant for the injuries claimed on November 1, 2008 or December 3, 2009, and award no compensation.
Made by: $\qquad$
Mark Siedlik
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Workers' Compensation
| Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION |
| FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge) |
| Injury No.: 09-104877 |
| Employee: | Gary Scott |
| Employer: | Scott Excavating (Settled) |
| Insurer: | Travelers Commercial Casualty (Settled) |
| Additional Party: | Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund |
| The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated August 28, 2012, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Mark Siedlik, issued August 28, 2012, is attached and incorporated by this reference.Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 30th day of May, 2013.LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION |
| V A C A N T Chairman |
| James Avery, Member |
| Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member |
| Attest: |
| Secretary |