(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 04-047878
Employee: Shane Null
Employer: New Haven Care Center, Inc.
Insurer: Missouri Nursing Home Trust
Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to $\S 286.090$ RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated October 13, 2011. The award and decision of Chief Administrative Law Judge Grant C. Gorman, issued October 13, 2011, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $21^{\text {st }}$ day of June 2013.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
John J. Larsen, Jr., Chairman
DISSENTING OPINION FILED
James G. Avery, Jr., Member
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Attest:
I have reviewed and considered all of the competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. Based on my review of the evidence as well as my consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, I believe the decision of the administrative law judge should be modified.
I agree that employee is permanently and totally disabled but I believe his inability to compete in the open labor market is due to the effects of his primary injury in combination with his preexisting disabilities.
I am persuaded by the expert medical opinion of Dr. Cantrell that as a result of his work injury employee sustained a 7 % permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to the low back. I also find that the restrictions imposed by Dr. Cantrell for the work injury most accurately reflect employee's physical limitations resultant from the work-related compression fracture and the pain associated therewith.
By contrast, some of the restrictions Dr. Volarich believed to be necessary as a result of the primary injury mirror self-imposed limitations employee was observing before the work injury. Before the work injury, employee had already adjusted the manner in which he performed his job due to his low back problems. For example, employee limited his lifting to less than fifty pounds and alternated physical work tasks with supervisory tasks to relieve pain in his low back.
Employee's vocational expert, Mr. Dolan, relied upon Dr. Volarich's physical restrictions in reaching his conclusion that employee is unable to compete in the open labor market. Mr. Dolan felt that if some of those restrictions pre-existed the work injury, then employee's inability to compete in the open labor market is due to the work injury in combination with his preexisting back problems. As noted above, some of employee's restrictions pre-existed the work injury.
I believe it is the effects of employee's work injury in combination with his many preexisting disabilities that render him unable to compete in the open labor market. I would modify the award of the administrative law judge to award permanent partial disability benefits from employer/insurer to employee. I would award permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund.
For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority of the Commission.