Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Alan Borders v. Francis Howell R-III School District

Decision date: February 5, 201528 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation for an employee who sustained a work-related injury on May 17, 2007, finding that the accident was the prevailing factor causing a herniated disc at L5-S1 and resulting permanent disability. The Commission found persuasive expert medical testimony establishing that the workplace accident caused the herniated disc and associated substantial permanent disability, meeting the employee's burden of proof under Missouri workers' compensation law.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion)
Employee:Alan D. Borders
Employer:Francis Howell R-III School District
Insurer:Missouri United School Insurance Company
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having read the briefs, heard the parties’ arguments, reviewed the evidence, and considered the whole record, we find that the award of the administrative law judge allowing compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge with this supplemental opinion.
Discussion Medical causation The parties presented voluminous medical records and expert testimony on the issue whether the accident of May 17, 2007, was the prevailing factor causing employee to sustain any medical condition or disability. The administrative law judge thoroughly summarized all of this evidence. Then, on page 17 of his award, the administrative law judge resolved the issue of medical causation as follows: “The claimant has prevailed by proving that his work-related injury caused substantial permanent disability based on the great weight of the evidence.”
We agree that employee met his burden of proof with respect to the issue of medical causation, but discern a need to supplement the administrative law judge’s finding in order to apply the appropriate statutory test and to make clear what specific medical conditions we believe resulted from the accident. The test for medical causation applicable to this claim is set forth in § 287.020.3(1) RSMo, which provides, in relevant part, as follows:
An injury by accident is compensable only if the accident was the prevailing factor in causing both the resulting medical condition and disability. “The prevailing factor” is defined to be the primary factor, in relation to any other factor, causing both the resulting medical condition and disability.
We find persuasive the unanimous expert medical opinions from Drs. Volarich, Margherita, and Coyle that the accident caused employee to suffer a herniated disc in his lumbar spine at L5-S1. We acknowledge that the evaluating psychiatrists Drs. Stillings and Smith disagreed whether employee suffered any psychiatric injury as a result of the accident. Dr. Stillings opined that the accident caused employee to suffer a major depressive

Improve: Alan D. Borders

- 2 -

disorder with an associated 25% psychiatric permanent partial disability of the body as a whole, as well as a pain disorder with an associated 10% psychiatric permanent partial disability of the body as a whole. Dr. Stillings also believed employee suffered from some preexisting psychiatric permanent partial disability stemming in part from the emotional and physical abuse employee endured at the hands of his father.

Dr. Smith, on the other hand, opined that the accident did not cause employee to suffer any psychiatric injury, and that employee presently suffers from the effects of preexisting somatization and personality disorders that account for what Dr. Smith described as a history of employee exaggerating his pain complaints. We note that on cross-examination, Dr. Smith conceded that she did not hew to the criteria set forth in the DSM¹ for establishing a diagnosis of somatization disorder, in that employee's history of pain complaints correlates to actual diagnosed conditions. We note also that Dr. Smith's opinions regarding employee's condition appear to stem largely from her own belief that an acute injury can never be the cause of a pain disorder, and that such issues are always personality-driven and thus preexisting by default.

After careful consideration, we find Dr. Stillings's medical causation opinion more persuasive. We find that the accident was the prevailing factor causing employee to suffer the resulting medical conditions of a herniated disc in his lumbar spine at L5-S1, a major depressive disorder, a pain disorder, and the disability associated therewith.

**Nature and extent of permanent disability**

The parties dispute whether employee is permanently and totally disabled, and if so, whether employer or the Second Injury Fund is liable for permanent total disability benefits. We defer to the administrative law judge's observations and findings with regard to employee's presentation at the hearing, and we ultimately agree with the administrative law judge that employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the primary injury considered in isolation, but we wish to provide some supplemental comments to clarify our reasoning.

Employer argues that the administrative law judge misunderstood Dr. Smith's testimony, pointing to the following statement on page 24 of the administrative law judge's award: "While Dr. Stillings diagnosed a pain disorder from the occurrence, Dr. Smith opined that the claimant had a disorder due to his reaction to the pain from the occurrence." Although we agree that this particular statement is somewhat unclear in that it is susceptible to a reading that suggests the administrative law judge believed Dr. Smith identified a disorder as resulting from the work injury, we are convinced from the context in which the statement appears that the administrative law judge fully understood Dr. Smith's testimony (as we do) to constitute an opinion that employee did not suffer any psychiatric injury whatsoever as a result of the accident. We have found the opinions from Dr. Smith lacking persuasive force, however.

We were more persuaded by the testimony from Dr. Stillings that employee is suffering from major depressive and pain disorders as a result of the primary injury. Combined with

¹ Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Dr. Smith agreed that this text, developed by the American Psychiatric Association, establishes the criteria for diagnosing mental disorders.

the credible testimony from Dr. Volarich that employee should be permitted to recline when needed owing to the effects of the work injury, and the unanimous opinions from the vocational experts that this restriction renders employee unable to compete for work in the open labor market, and absent persuasive expert psychiatric evidence that employee's current experience of pain (and consequent need to lie down) is the product of the effects of employee's primary low back injury acting in combination with some partially disabling preexisting psychiatric condition of ill-being, we are convinced that the record best supports a finding that employee is permanently and totally disabled owing to the work injury considered in isolation. We so find.

Conclusion

We affirm and adopt the award of the administrative law judge, as supplemented herein.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Edwin J. Kohner, issued May 20, 2014, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

We approve and affirm the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $5^{\text {th }}$ day of February 2015.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

John J. Larsen, Jr., Chairman

James G. Avery, Jr., Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Employee:Alan D. BordersInjury No.: 07-063983
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers' <br> Compensation
Employer:Francis Howell R III School DistrictDepartment of Labor and Industrial
Additional Party:Second Injury FundRelations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Missouri United School Insurance Company
Hearing Date:March 24, 2014Checked by: EJK/kr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: May 17, 2007
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Charles County, Missouri
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted:

Employee was throwing heavy bags of trash overhead into a trash dumpster when he twisted his back and felt pain.

  1. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  2. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Low back
  3. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: Permanent total disability
  4. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 10,475.58
  5. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer: $\ 134,551.75
  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? $\ 4,990.00
  2. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 482.73
  3. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 321.82
  4. Method wages computation: By agreement

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

Unpaid medical expenses:

$\ 4,990.00

Permanent total disability benefits from Employer beginning September 2, 2010, for Claimant's lifetime

Indeterminate

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: No

TOTAL:

Indeterminate

  1. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin September 2, 2010, and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: Dean L. Christianson, Esq.

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Alan D. Borders

Injury No.: 07-063983

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Francis Howell R III School District

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund

Insurer: Missouri United School Insurance Company

Before the

Division of Workers'

Compensation

Department of Labor and Industrial

Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Checked by: EJK/kr

This workers' compensation case raises several issues arising out of a work-related injury in which the claimant, a school custodian, suffered a herniated disc in his low back while lifting and throwing trash bags into a trash dumpster. The issues for determination are (1) Medical causation, (2) Liability for Past Medical Expenses, (3) Future medical care, (4) Permanent disability, and (5) Liability of the Second Injury Fund. The evidence compels an award for the claimant for medical expenses, future medical care, and permanent total disability benefits.

At the hearing, the claimant and Randall Carpenter testified in person, and the claimant offered depositions of David T. Volarich, D.O., Anthony J. Margherita, M.D., Joan M. Pernoud, M.D., Wayne T. Stillings, M.D., and J. Stephen Dolan, M.A., C.R.C., a memorandum from Randall Carpenter, records from the Social Security Administration, and voluminous medical records. The defense offered depositions of James J. Coyle, M.D., Russell C. Cantrell, M.D., Stacey L. Smith, M.D., Richard D. Wetzel, Ph.D., and Karen Kane-Thaler, M.S. Ed., C.R.C., a DVD, surveillance reports, and a copy of the claimant's Face Book page. The Second Injury Fund offered a deposition of James M. England.

All

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words