Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Danny Sanders v. Rollet Brothers Trucking Company

Decision date: January 27, 2016Injury #13-07715523 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of temporary compensation to employee Danny Sanders for a back injury sustained during a mandatory physical evaluation program required by his employer as a condition of returning to work. The Commission held that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment under the statutory test, rejecting the employer's argument that the employee was not "on the clock" at the time of injury.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

TEMPORARY AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion)
Employee:Danny Sanders
Employer:Rollet Brothers Trucking Company
Insurer:National Interstate Insurance
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund (Open)
This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having read the briefs, reviewed the evidence, and considered the whole record, we find that the award of the administrative law judge allowing compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge with this supplemental opinion.
Discussion Injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employmentWe agree with the administrative law judge that employee sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of employment when he injured his back during a physical evaluation program that employer required him to complete as a condition of returning to active duties. We write to provide some clarifying comments.We note that the administrative law judge cited and discussed a number of appellate decisions applying the language of Chapter 287 as it existed prior to the legislative changes adopted in 2005. Those legislative changes included the sweeping abrogation of all case law interpretations on the meaning or definition of the terms “arising out of,” and “in the course of the employment.” See § 287.020.10 RSMo. Consequently, while we believe the pre-2005 case law on this topic may provide a certain degree of guidance where there is a dearth of otherwise applicable authority, our analysis of whether employee’s injury arose out of and in the course of the employment must ultimately begin and end with the statutory test set forth at § 287.020.3(2) RSMo:
An injury shall be deemed to arise out of and in the course of the employment only if:(a) It is reasonably apparent, upon consideration of all the circumstances, that the accident is the prevailing factor in causing the injury; and(b) It does not come from a hazard or risk unrelated to the employment to which workers would have been equally exposed outside of and unrelated to the employment in normal nonemployment life.Having said that, we acknowledge that the administrative law judge did ultimately apply the foregoing test and completed the appropriate analysis. Employer’s primary argument is that employee was not “on the clock” and thus did not receive any compensation for the work employer required of him in completing the Work Steps evaluation. The courts have suggested that such an argument is unavailing. SeeHenry v. Precision Apparatus, Inc., 309 S.W.3d 341 (Mo. App. 2010).

- 2 -

We would additionally point out that by virtue of the mandate of § 287.800.1 RSMo, we must strictly construe the terms of § 287.020.3(2). Strictly construing those terms, we find no requirement that an employee be "on the clock" or receiving remuneration at the time a work injury occurs. Rather, an employee need only demonstrate that the accident was the prevailing factor causing the injury, and that the injury did not come from a hazard or risk unrelated to the employment to which workers would have been equally exposed in normal nonemployment life. We defer to the administrative law judge's findings of fact, and we agree that they demonstrate that, without question, employee's injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Failure to comply with a temporary award

We wish to remind the parties that $\S 287.510$ RSMo provides, as follows:

In any case a temporary or partial award of compensation may be made, and the same may be modified from time to time to meet the needs of the case, and the same may be kept open until a final award can be made, and if the same be not complied with, the amount equal to the value of compensation ordered and unpaid may be doubled in the final award, if the final award shall be in accordance with the temporary or partial award.

Consistent with the foregoing provisions, if the compensation ordered herein is not promptly paid to employee, it is our intention, in the event we are asked to render a final award in this matter, to double any and all amounts ordered and unpaid.

Conclusion

We affirm and adopt the award of the administrative law judge as supplemented herein.

The award and decision of Chief Administrative Law Judge Lawrence C. Kasten, issued September 22, 2015, is attached and incorporated herein to the extent not inconsistent with this supplemental decision.

This award is only temporary or partial. It is subject to further order, and the proceedings are hereby continued and kept open until a final award can be made.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 27^{\text {th }}$ day of January 2016.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

John J. Larsen, Jr., Chairman

James G. Avery, Jr., Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

Employee:Danny Q. SandersInjury No. 13-077155
Dependents:N/A
Employer:Rollet Bros. Trucking Co.
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund (Left Open)
Insurer:National Interstate Insurance
Appearances:Sarah Elfrink, attorney for the employee.
Kevin Johnson, attorney for the employer-insurer.

Hearing Date: July 22, 2015 Checked by: LCK/kg

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease? October 1, 2013.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Perry County, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did Employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by law? Yes.
Employee: Danny Q. SandersInjury No. 13-077155
  1. Was Employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  2. Describe work Employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted: The employee lifted a box and injured his low back.
  3. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No.
  4. Parts of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Low back and body as a whole.
  5. Compensation paid to date for temporary total disability: N/A
  6. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by the employer-insurer? 557.25
  7. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by the employer-insurer? 209.09
  8. Employee's average weekly wage: 644.82
  9. Weekly compensation rate: 429.90
  10. Method wages computation: By agreement.
  11. Amount of compensation payable: Unpaid medical expenses-209.09

Medical Mileage-175.86

Temporary total disability-40,533.42

Total: 40,918.37

This award is only temporary and partial, is subject to further order, and the proceedings are hereby continued and the case kept open until a final award can be made.

IF THIS AWARD IS NOT COMPLIED WITH, THE AMOUNT AWARDED HEREIN MAY BE DOUBLED IN THE FINAL AWARD, IF SUCH FINAL AWARD IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TEMPORARY AWARD.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

On July 22, 2015, the employee, Danny Q. Sanders, appeared in person and with his attorney, Sarah Elfrink, for a temporary or partial award. The employer-insurer was represented by their attorney, Kevin Johnson. The parties agreed on certain undisputed facts and identified the issues that were in dispute. These undisputed facts and issues, together with a summary of the evidence and the findings of fact and rulings of law, are set forth below as follows:

UNDISPUTED FACTS:

  1. Rollet Bros. Trucking Co. was operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act, and its liability was fully insured by National Interstate Insurance.
  2. On October 1, 2013, Danny Sanders was an employee of Rollet Bros. Trucking Co. and was working under the Workers' Compensation Act.
  3. The employer had notice of the employee's alleged accident.
  4. The employee's claim was filed within the time allowed by law.
  5. The employee's average weekly wage was $\ 644.82. The rate of compensation is $\ 429.90.
  6. The employer-insurer paid $\ 557.25 in medical aid.
  7. The employer-insurer paid no temporary disability benefits.

ISSUES:

  1. Accident
  2. Medical Causation
  3. Previously Incurred Medical Aid
  4. Claim for Mileage
  5. Claim for Additional Medical Aid
  6. Temporary Total Disability

Employee's Exhibits

  1. Report of Injury
  2. Original and Amended Claims for Compensation
  3. Medical and billing records from Occupational Medicine Center
  4. Billing records from Healthcare Healthmart Pharmacy
  5. Employer's Pay-Out Log of Medical Aid Paid
  6. Mileage Reimbursement Summary
  7. Deposition of the employee
  8. Deposition of Dr. Hammond with CV, medical reports, and letters
  9. Medical Records for 2011 injury from Dr. Marsh, Mid America Rehab, and Dr. Doll
  10. June 24, 2013 Mid America Rehab WorkSTEPS Post Employment/Fit for Duty Report

Employer-Insurer's Exhibits

A. Deposition of Dr. Cantrell with CV, records, report, and letter

B. Occupational Medicine Center medical records

C. Perry County Memorial Hospital medical records

D. August 11, 2011 MRI Report from Cape Imaging

E. Medical Records of Dr. Marsh

Judicial Notice of the Contents of the Division's files of the employee was taken.

WITNESS:

Danny Sanders, the employee

BRIEFS:

The employee filed his proposed award on August 13, 2015. The employer-insurer filed their proposed award on August 24, 2015.

FINDINGS OF FACT:

The employee testified that he is 62 years old and has been married for 32 years. He had several prior injuries. In 1979 while working on cable he fell approximately 90 feet. He had extensive surgeries on his feet and ankles. Due to the injury he made a career change and went into truck driving. In 1993 he was working at Gilster-Mary Lee and had an on-the-job hernia. During the surgery, Dr. Pontillas sewed up a nerve which caused a lot of complications. He was not able to work for a long time and had trouble walking. He was on social security disability for about two years, but he wanted to work for a living. Another doctor performed two additional surgeries where a nerve was cut to deaden the pain. Due to an infection, his left testicle had to be removed. After those additional surgeries, he returned to work. He started having heart problems in the late 1990s or early 2000. He was first diagnosed with heart problems when he was in Tupelo, Mississippi. He had stents and then a double bypass. The employee moved back to Missouri, and Dr. Talbert became his heart doctor.

The employee testified that on August 1, 2011, while working at Buchheit, he had a back injury from loading shingles. He felt a pop and had really sharp pains in his back that caused him to fall to his knees on the parking lot.

The employee went to Perry County Memorial Hospital emergency room on August 1, 2011, due to low back pain from lifting shingles at work. X-rays showed posterior facet degenerative changes bilaterally at L5. The employee saw Dr. Marsh on August 3, 2011. On examination, the employee had tenderness with palpation in the middle lumbar region. There was decreased sensitivity in the left quadriceps and hamstring and laterally along the left leg to the knee. Dr. Marsh assessed low back pain with radiation of pain into the left buttock and down

Employee: Danny Q. Sanders

**Injury No. 13-077155**

To the left knee, X-rays showed posterior facet degenerative changes bilaterally at L5. Dr. Marsh prescribed Percocet and a Medrol Dosepak. The employee was to contin

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words