The Claimant, Doris Hazelrigg, testified in person and offered Exhibits A and B which were admitted without objection.
The Second Injury Fund did not call any witnesses or offer any exhibits.
Hazelrigg's testimony was credible. Claimant is 82 years old. At the time of her accident, she had worked for Garry Gribble Running Sports as a retail clerk for 16 years. She had a prior right knee injury resulting in chronic and progressive osteoarthritis. In order to delay the need for a knee replacement, she received a series of Suparz and Cortisone injections. She had pain and stiffness in her knee making it difficult to kneel and squat. Hazelrigg testified at trial that she changed the way she did several of her job duties because of the pain in her knee.
The Second Injury Fund argues that because Hazelrigg was physically fit and able to run half marathons and other shorter distance races prior to her injury at work, her knee condition is not a disability and a hindrance and an obstacle to her employment. However, Hazelrigg was consistent and credible in her testimony that her knee injury made it difficult to kneel, squat, climb ladders and sit on stool to fit customers in shoes and how she modified the physical actions required to do her job at Garry Gribble. In addition, Claimant offered medical records and expert opinion at hearing that support and corroborate her testimony. I do not find the Second Injury's argument to be credible or persuasive.
On March 2, 2013, Hazelrigg sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course and scope of employment that resulted in injury to her back and ribs. As a result, Hazelrigg has the following limitations or complaints regarding the work injury: pain in back, stiffness, reduced strength and difficulty breathing. She also testified that her Employer did not allow her to return to work and that she was not able to re-gain employment after her work-related accident.
Prior to date of injury, Hazelrigg had the following disabling condition:
1) Claimant had a right knee injury. This condition was disabling and constituted a hindrance and obstacle to employment.
Dr. Poppa assessed 30 percent body as a whole as a result of her March 2, 2013 accident at work. He assessed 20 percent permanent partial disability of her right lower extremity at the knee. Dr. Poppa found that the injuries combined to create a synergistic effect of 15 percent enhancement.
Hazelrigg has established a right to recover from the Second Injury Fund. A claimant in a workers' compensation proceeding has the burden of proving all elements of his claim to a reasonable probability. Cardwell v. Treasurer of State of Missouri, 249 S.W. 3d 902, 911 (Mo.App. E.D. 2008). In order for a claimant to recover against the Second Injury Fund, he must prove that he sustained a compensable injury, referred to
as "the last injury," which resulted in permanent partial disability. Section 287.220.1 RSMo. A claimant must also prove that he had a pre-existing permanent partial disability, whether from a compensable injury or otherwise, that: (1) existed at the time the last injury was sustained; (2) was of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to his employment or reemployment should he become unemployed; and (3) equals a minimum of 50 weeks of comp for injuries to the body as a whole or 15 % for major extremities. Dunn v. Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund, 272 S.W. 3d 267, 272 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008) (Citations omitted). In order for a claimant to be entitled to recover permanent partial disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund, he must prove that the last injury, combined with his pre-existing permanent partial disabilities, causes greater overall disability than the independent sum of the disabilities. Elrod v. Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, 183 S.W. 3d 714, 717-718 (Mo.Banc 2004). Claimant has met the burden imposed by law.
Having given careful consideration to the entire record, based upon the above testimony, stipulations of the parties, the competent and substantial evidence presented, and the applicable law of the State of Missouri and stipulations of the parties, I find the following:
1) Hazelrigg sustained a compensable last injury which resulted in permanent partial disability equivalent to 16.5 percent disability to the body as a whole. (66 weeks)
2) As of the time the last injury was sustained, Hazelrigg had the following preexisting permanent partial disability which meets the statutory thresholds and is of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to employment or re-employment:
a. 20 percent to the right knee ( 32 weeks)
3) The credible evidence establishes that the last injury, combined with the pre-existing permanent partial disabilities, causes 10 percent greater overall disability than the independent sum of the disabilities. The Second Injury Fund liability is calculated as follows: 66 weeks for the last injury plus 32 weeks for pre-existing injuries $=98 weeks \times 10 \%=9.8$ weeks of overall greater disability.