The pivotal issue in this case is whether the employee's work accident of September 14, 2015, is the prevailing factor causing the injuries and conditions alleged in her compensation claim.
Carole Jones, a retail store employee, sustained a work injury on September 14, 2015, while lifting fifty-pound bags of birdseed off a flatbed cart and onto a shelf. Employee's injury occurred while she was deep cleaning employer's bird food aisle after an insect infestation. Employee initially complained to employer and employer's designated physician Dr. Janet Elliot about pain in her upper back and shoulder region. The record, including employee's testimony, demonstrates that employee's symptoms for this region, as well as her lower back, have persisted since the date of injury. The evidence further documents a history of medical intervention from September 14, 2015, to present for employee's ongoing shoulder and back pain.
On September 23, 2015, employee's physical therapist noted employee's report of soreness in her upper trapezius region and assessed a dorsal strain. Through October of 2014, employer's physician Dr. Elliot prescribed light duty to employee to recuperate from injury to her back. On January 19, 2016, two days after employee visited the emergency room for pain to her mid and lower back, Dr. Elliot informed employee that she was at maximum medical improvement and released employee from her care.
The majority's award relies on the ratings of employer's expert, Dr. Michael Chabot, who concluded that employee's lower back strain was unrelated to her September 14, 2015, work injury. Dr. Chabot provided no treatment and saw employee only one time. He based his conclusion regarding medical causation of employee's lower back strain, in part, on the lapse in time between the employee's initial injury and her subsequent complaint of lumbar pain. Dr. Chabot nevertheless conceded when deposed that lumbar strain can come from an injury such as employee suffered.
The majority's finding that employer was not responsible for any past or future medical expenses because employee failed to establish a causal link between her work injury and her low back condition ignores employee's testimony about the location of the pain as well as her recollection that she was limping the day of the injury. Both are evidence of more than an injury located in her shoulder. The majority fails to appropriately credit the independent medical examination of Dr. Michael Snyder, who found all current symptoms of employee's lumbar spine directly related to her September 14, 2015, work injury. Given the lack of evidence of prior or subsequent injury to any part of employee's lower back, it is against the evidence to find employee's lower back strain unrelated to her September 2015, work injury.
Employee's attorney correctly notes that determination of a specific amount of or percentage of disability is a factual finding within the special province of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) and that the Commission is not required to adopt a physician's rating for an injury. *ABB Power T & D Co., v. Kempker*, 236 S.W.3d 43, 52 (Mo. App. 2007). Based on the evidence from employee's treating physicians, an award of 15% of the body as a whole for permanent disability to
Injury No.: 15-070736
Employee: Carole Jones
- 2 -
employee's cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine is appropriate. Employee should also receive compensation for outstanding medical bills related to her work injury in the amount of $3,360.00, as detailed in employee's brief.
I respectfully dissent from the majority's denial of all compensation in this case.
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Employee: Carole Jones
Injury No. 15-070736