Claimant is a 48 year old male. He worked for Courtesy Diner for approximately 2 1/2 years. He has been unemployed since his dismissal from Courtesy Diner in February or March of 2016. While employed at Courtesy Diner, he was a manager/supervisor. His hours varied, but were usually Monday through Friday. His duties included cashiering, cooking, washing dishes, cleaning, maintenance, keeping the restrooms and parking lot clean and filling stock.
Claimant testified, that on March 16, 2015, he was working the afternoon and overnight shifts. His hours were 2:00 pm to 7:00 am. The alleged injury occurred at approximately 8:00 or 9:00 pm. He was moving a refrigerator at work and injured his back. The refrigerator was a double door type, approximately 7 feet high and 4 feet wide. It was close to empty. He tried to move it to clean behind it. He was standing and pushing the refrigerator when one wheel jammed in the tile floor. He felt a poping pain in his lower, right back, above the belt line.
Claimant further testified that he informed a co-worker, Matt Casanoven, what had happened and that he had felt pain. Claimant moved the refrigerator back into place and finished his shift. He stated that he had difficulty, pain in his back, numbness in both feet and right leg.
Claimant reported the injury on March 18, 2015, the day after he went to the emergency room at St. Mary's Hospital. Claimant testified that the physician at St. Mary's diagnosed sciatica. He was given an injection and a prescription for pain. Claimant received no additional treatment. Claimant is still in pain in his lower right back, right leg and right foot. He currently takes Aleve, Advil, Excedrin, and aspirin two times per week.
The physicians at St. Mary's did not recommend further treatment. St. Mary's records show that claimant was there on March 17, 2015. He told St. Mary's that he was "self-pay, no insurance." The history that claimant gave to St. Mary's was "pain was for 2 weeks, started radiating last night." Additional history indicates "lower back pain for 2 months, worse the last 2 weeks. Pain is associated with no known injury." No doctor took claimant off work or issued any work restrictions.
William Rugg testified on behalf of the employer/insurer. He has been the manager of Courtesy Diner since January 2004. He testified that claimant called off work on March 17, 2015. Claimant told Mr. Rugg that he slipped on water, at the Drury Inn, and hurt his back. Mr. Rugg testified that claimant never told him that he hurt his back at work, nor ask for treatment. Claimant would occasionally complain that his back would hurt but he was able to perform the same job duties. Mr. Rugg further testified that when he confronted claimant about a missing can of bear mace, claimant responded that "it was nice working with him."
Matthew Casanoven testified on behalf of the employer/insurer. He is a cook at Courtesy Diner and has known claimant for around five years. He testified that claimant "complained about back pain but never mentioned a work injury."
WC-32-R1 (6-81)
Page 4
Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Injury No.: 15-105257
Lori Coker testified on behalf of employer/insurer. She is a server/manager at Courtesy Diner. She lives in a house located next door to the diner. She has worked at Courtesy Diner for approximately five years. She testified that claimant never complained about back or leg problems. He never told her that he was hurt at work. When she moved into her house in April of 2016, claimant helped her move. The move took all day. There are 15 or 16 steps in the rear of the house, which claimant ascended and descended during the move. Claimant never complained of pain.
Opinion Evidence
Dr. Woiteshek
Claimant offered the independent medical evaluation conducted by Dr. Dwight Woiteshek, M.D., as Exhibit 1. Dr. Woiteshek examined claimant on October 21, 2016. He personally obtained a medical history, performed a physical examination and reviewed the records from St. Mary's Health Center. Dr. Woiteshek noted that claimant sought medical attention at St. Mary's Health Center on March 17, 2015. Claimant was complaining of pain and discomfort in his lumbar spine with pain radiating into his right leg. X-rays of the lumbar spine were taken on March 17, 2015, that showed no evidence of acute fracture or dislocation but did show a mild left scoliosis which was felt to be mostly positional with mild degenerative changes.
It is Dr. Woiteshek's opinion, that the work-related injury on March 16, 2015, was the prevailing factor in the cause of his traumatic right lumbar radiculopathy, reasonably confirmed without surgery. The work-related injury was also the prevailing factor in the cause of the future medical treatment recommended.
Dr. Woitehek concluded that within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, claimant needs future medical treatment including, but not limited to, an MRI scan of the lumbar spine followed by a consultation with a spine surgeon.
Dr. Doll
Employer/Insurer offered the deposition testimony of Dr. James T. Doll, M.D., as Exhibit A. He was deposed on April 11, 2018. He evaluated the claimant on January 30, 2017. During the examination, he had claimant perform a straight leg raising test. It is a test for lumbar radiculopathy. The test was negative for radiculopathy. Dr. Doll diagnosed claimant with diffuse low back pain and right greater than left lower extremity pain and paresthesias. He also listed a diagnosis of lumbar spondylosis.
Dr. Doll stated that after meeting claimant and reviewing his symptoms, he found inconsistencies. He could not correlate specifically with his pattern of symptoms and any specific examination findings. His physical exam revealed there were no focal areas of abnormalities or any abnormal objective findings on his exam. Dr. Doll found no indication that claimant had sustained any permanent disability.
WC-32-R1 (6-81)
Page 5
Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Injury No.: 15-105257
Finally, when asked if there was any history in the St. Mary's record, of any injury at work, Dr. Doll responded, "No, there was no notation of an injury at work. In fact, there was a statement that said that there was no known injury."