Case Authority

a promise to answer for the debts of another is within the purview of the statute of frauds national refining co v mcdowel 201 sw2d 342

This authority appears in 1 citation record in the Ott Law Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID: case:a-promise-to-answer-for-the-debts-of-another-is-within-the-purview-of-the-statute-of-frauds-national-refining-co-v-mcdowel-201-sw2d-342
Citation Sample: A promise to answer for the debts of another is within the purview of the Statute of Frauds. National Refining Co. v. McDowel, 201 S.W.2d 342
Cases Shown: 1

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Citation Treatment

cited

Cases Citing a promise to answer for the debts of another is within the purview of the statute of frauds national refining co v mcdowel 201 sw2d 342

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Browse Opinions

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

Healthstyle Products International, Inc., Appellant, v. Union Planters Bank, Respondent, and A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Defendant.

cited

Citation: A promise to answer for the debts of another is within the purview of the Statute of Frauds. National Refining Co. v. McDowel, 201 S.W.2d 342