Case Authority

allsberry v flynn 628 sw3d 392

This authority appears in 12 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID: case:allsberry-v-flynn-628-sw3d-392
Citation Sample: Allsberry v. Flynn, 628 S.W.3d 392
Cases Shown: 12

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation Real Estate Criminal Law Employment Law Corporate Law Personal Injury

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to allsberry v flynn 628 sw3d 392?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

Cases Citing allsberry v flynn 628 sw3d 392

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Browse Opinions

Supreme Court of Missouri / Jan 23, 2026

Colleen Eikmeier and William S. Love, Appellants, vs. Granite Springs Home Owners Association, Inc. A Missouri Not-For-Profit Corp., Respondent.

cited

Citation: Allsberry v. Flynn, 628 S.W.3d 392

The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's judgment and held that a 2022 statute prohibiting homeowners' associations from banning solar panel installations applies to preexisting covenants, not just prospective ones. The homeowners' challenge to the HOA's restriction on solar panels visible from the street was successful, as the statute's prohibitions supersede prior restrictive covenants.

Real Estate Corporate Law Civil Litigation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Dec 23, 2025