St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

blackburn v habitat dev co 57 sw3d 378

This authority appears in 16 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:blackburn-v-habitat-dev-co-57-sw3d-378
Citation Sample
Blackburn v. Habitat Dev. Co., 57 S.W.3d 378
Cases Shown
16
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Real EstateCorporate LawCriminal LawCivil LitigationInsurance Bad Faith

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to blackburn v habitat dev co 57 sw3d 378?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

16

Cases Citing blackburn v habitat dev co 57 sw3d 378

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

cited

Citation: Blackburn v. Habitat Dev. Co., 57 S.W.3d 378

In this quiet title appeal, the court reversed the trial court's interpretation of an easement deed that the Daumes held over a private roadway. The court rejected the trial court's constructions that the easement's 'non-commercial purposes' limitation prohibited agricultural use and that it was restricted to the Daumes and their immediate family members.

Real EstateCorporate LawCivil Litigation