St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

dilley v valentine 401 sw3d 544

This authority appears in 18 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:dilley-v-valentine-401-sw3d-544
Citation Sample
Dilley v. Valentine, 401 S.W.3d 544
Cases Shown
18
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Personal InjuryCivil LitigationCar AccidentsWrongful DeathCriminal LawInsurance Bad Faith

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to dilley v valentine 401 sw3d 544?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

17

followed

1

Cases Citing dilley v valentine 401 sw3d 544

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

cited

Citation: Dilley v. Valentine, 401 S.W.3d 544

Appellants sought damages for a wrongful death resulting from a motor vehicle collision involving a pursued driver, alleging the Missouri State Highway Patrol's pursuit was negligent and proximately caused the collision. The court affirmed summary judgment for MSHP, finding that Appellants failed to produce sufficient facts demonstrating that MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, which is a necessary element of their case.

Personal InjuryCar AccidentsWrongful Death