Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

fireworks restoration co v hosto 371 sw3d 83

This authority appears in 1 citation record in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:fireworks-restoration-co-v-hosto-371-sw3d-83
Citation Sample
Fireworks Restoration Co. v. Hosto, 371 S.W.3d 83
Cases Shown
1
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Citation Treatment

cited

1

Cases Citing fireworks restoration co v hosto 371 sw3d 83

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Citation: Fireworks Restoration Co. v. Hosto, 371 S.W.3d 83

The court affirmed the directed verdict as to four counts against Norman based on agency but vacated and remanded the defamation counts against Kaminsky and one count against Norman, finding that the circuit court erred in requiring independent evidence of reputational damage beyond the plaintiff's own testimony when the evidence of harm was substantial and directly resulted from the defendants' statements.