St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

green v fotoohighiam 606 sw3d 113

This authority appears in 121 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:green-v-fotoohighiam-606-sw3d-113
Citation Sample
Green v. Fotoohighiam, 606 S.W.3d 113
Cases Shown
50
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationPersonal InjuryReal EstateEmployment LawCorporate LawInsurance Bad Faith

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to green v fotoohighiam 606 sw3d 113?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

110

followed

10

distinguished

1

Cases Citing green v fotoohighiam 606 sw3d 113

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

cited

Citation: Green v. Fotoohighiam, 606 S.W.3d 113

The trial court granted summary judgment to the Metzgers on their claim for a prescriptive easement over a portion of a paved driveway between their home and the Morelocks' property. The appellate court affirmed the grant of summary judgment, finding no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Real EstateCivil Litigation
cited

Citation: Green v. Fotoohighiam, 606 S.W.3d 113

The court affirmed the circuit court's decision to exclude Hanshaw's expert witness testimony and grant summary judgment to Crown Equipment in a product liability case involving an allegedly defectively designed forklift. The expert's opinions were properly excluded because they were not supported by reliable methodology, as the expert performed no tests and failed to demonstrate how cited research and data supported his conclusions.

Personal InjuryCivil Litigation
cited

Citation: Green v. Fotoohighiam, 606 S.W.3d 113

Appellants sought damages for a wrongful death resulting from a motor vehicle collision involving a pursued driver, alleging the Missouri State Highway Patrol's pursuit was negligent and proximately caused the collision. The court affirmed summary judgment for MSHP, finding that Appellants failed to produce sufficient facts demonstrating that MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, which is a necessary element of their case.

Personal InjuryCar AccidentsWrongful Death