Case Authority

johnson v allstate ins co 262 sw3d 655

This authority appears in 9 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID: case:johnson-v-allstate-ins-co-262-sw3d-655
Citation Sample: Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 262 S.W.3d 655
Cases Shown: 9

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Real Estate Criminal Law Insurance Bad Faith Civil Litigation Estate Planning

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to johnson v allstate ins co 262 sw3d 655?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

Cases Citing johnson v allstate ins co 262 sw3d 655

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Browse Opinions

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 3, 2026

Kevin Rosenbohm, Trustee of the Kevin and Michele Rosenbohm Family Trust Dated July 1, 2011 and Matt Rosenbohm and Nick Rosenbohm vs. Gregory Stiens, and Gregory Stiens, Trustee of the Anthony Stiens Trust

cited

Citation: Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 262 S.W.3d 655

The court affirmed the circuit court's judgment in favor of the Rosenbohms on their adverse possession and trespass claims against Stiens regarding disputed tracts of property in Nodaway County. The court rejected Stiens's arguments regarding excluded evidence, cross-examination, jury instructions on permissive use defense, and remanded the case for the court to amend the judgment with precise legal descriptions of the disputed property.

Real Estate Civil Litigation Estate Planning

Supreme Court of Missouri / Dec 9, 2014