Case Authority

kings arguments are not well taken on their merits see james v paul 49 sw3d 678

This authority appears in 1 citation record in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID: case:kings-arguments-are-not-well-taken-on-their-merits-see-james-v-paul-49-sw3d-678
Citation Sample: King's arguments are not well taken on their merits. See James v. Paul, 49 S.W.3d 678
Cases Shown: 1

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Criminal Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to kings arguments are not well taken on their merits see james v paul 49 sw3d 678?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Criminal Law Consultation Call About A Criminal Law Claim

Citation Treatment

cited

Cases Citing kings arguments are not well taken on their merits see james v paul 49 sw3d 678

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Browse Opinions

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Date unavailable

IN THE MATTER OF THE CARE AND TREATMENT OF LLOYD KING, a/k/a LLOYD E. KING, a/k/a EDDIE KING, a/k/a SCOTT WARLOCK, a/k/a LLOYD EDWARD KING, a/k/a NIKKI EDWARD MERRELL, and a/k/a NIKKI MERRELL, Appellant vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

cited

Citation: King's arguments are not well taken on their merits. See James v. Paul, 49 S.W.3d 678

Criminal Law