St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

mo coal for envt v state 593 sw3d 534

This authority appears in 3 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:mo-coal-for-envt-v-state-593-sw3d-534
Citation Sample
Mo. Coal. for Env't v. State, 593 S.W.3d 534
Cases Shown
3
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationPersonal InjuryCriminal Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to mo coal for envt v state 593 sw3d 534?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

3

Cases Citing mo coal for envt v state 593 sw3d 534

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 29, 2026

Emily Omohundro vs. Denny Hoskins, Missouri Secretary of State, et al.

cited

Citation: Mo. Coal. for Env't v. State, 593 S.W.3d 534

The court reversed the trial court's approval of the summary statement for an initiative petition seeking to amend the Missouri Constitution to prevent public funds from benefiting nonpublic schools. The court agreed with the appellant that the summary statement was insufficient and unfair, and certified an alternative statement to the Secretary of State for inclusion on the ballot.

Civil Litigation