St. Louis Counsel

LIRC Archive Appellate Opinions

OTT LAWLitigation + Public Legal Research

(314) 710-2740 Free Consultation

Case Authority

our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo itt commercial finance v mid am marine 854 sw2d 371

This authority appears in 6 citation records in the Ott Law Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID: case:our-review-of-a-grant-of-summary-judgment-is-essentially-de-novo-itt-commercial-finance-v-mid-am-marine-854-sw2d-371
Citation Sample: Our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371
Cases Shown: 6

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Citation Treatment

cited

6

Cases Citing our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo itt commercial finance v mid am marine 854 sw2d 371

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Browse Opinions

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

Claude Risher and Brenda Faye Risher, Appellants, v. Farmers Insurance Company, Respondent.

cited

Citation: Our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

Douglas L. Daugherty, Appellant v. The City of Maryland Heights, Respondent

cited

Citation: Our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

Charles D. Lonero, Appellant v. John Dillick, Defendant and Pulitzer, Inc., St. Louis Post Dispatch, LLC and St. Louis Post Dispatch, LLC and St. Louis Distribution Services, LLC, Respondents.

cited

Citation: Our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

United Petroleum Services, Inc., Appellant v. Thomas Piatchek, Respondent.

cited

Citation: Our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

Giessow Restaurants, Inc., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richmond Restaurants, Inc., Defendant/Appellant.

cited

Citation: Our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

Catherine A. Chamness, Appellant, v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent.

cited

Citation: Our review of a grant of summary judgment is essentially de novo. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 371