Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

strake v robinwood w cmty improvement dist 473 sw3d 642

This authority appears in 4 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:strake-v-robinwood-w-cmty-improvement-dist-473-sw3d-642
Citation Sample
Strake v. Robinwood W. Cmty. Improvement Dist., 473 S.W.3d 642
Cases Shown
4
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationCriminal LawEmployment LawCorporate LawFamily Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to strake v robinwood w cmty improvement dist 473 sw3d 642?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Litigation ConsultationCall About A Litigation Claim

Citation Treatment

cited

4

Cases Citing strake v robinwood w cmty improvement dist 473 sw3d 642

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Supreme Court of Missouri / Jan 13, 2026

In re: Mark W. Arensberg, Respondent.

cited

Citation: Strake v. Robinwood W. Cmty. Improvement Dist., 473 S.W.3d 642

Attorney Arensberg was disciplined for knowingly drafting fraudulent loan documents to diminish a client's son's marital estate during divorce proceedings. Rather than the agreed-upon reprimand, the court imposed an indefinite suspension with a six-month waiting period for reinstatement, stayed pending successful completion of one-year probation.

Family LawCivil Litigation