Case Authority

we review a granted motion for summary judgment de novo st louis univ v masonic temple assn 220 sw3d 721

This authority appears in 1 citation record in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID: case:we-review-a-granted-motion-for-summary-judgment-de-novo-st-louis-univ-v-masonic-temple-assn-220-sw3d-721
Citation Sample: We review a granted motion for summary judgment de novo. St. Louis Univ. v. Masonic Temple Ass'n, 220 S.W.3d 721
Cases Shown: 1

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to we review a granted motion for summary judgment de novo st louis univ v masonic temple assn 220 sw3d 721?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

Cases Citing we review a granted motion for summary judgment de novo st louis univ v masonic temple assn 220 sw3d 721

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Browse Opinions

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

State ex rel. Pettis County R-XII School District and Pettis County R-XII School District, Appellant, v. Rusty Kahrs, Larry Wilson and Rod Lindemann, Individually and as County Commissioners of the County of Pettis and Marsha Boeschen, Individually and as County Collector of the County of Pettis and Robert Leftwich, Individually and as County Collector of the County of Pettis and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, as Surety on the Collectors Official Bond for Robert Leftwich as County Collector of the County of Pettis, and Tyson Foods, Inc., Respondents.

cited

Citation: We review a granted motion for summary judgment de novo. St. Louis Univ. v. Masonic Temple Ass'n, 220 S.W.3d 721