Bruce Roath, Appellant, v. Michael Hunt and Lee Nation, Respondents.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Bruce Roath, Appellant, v. Michael Hunt and Lee Nation, Respondents. Case Number: No. 53977 Handdown Date: 09/23/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Edith L. Messina Counsel for Appellant: Bruce Roath Counsel for Respondent: Lee Nation Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Berrey, Spinden and Smart, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Bruce Roath appeals the circuit court's judgment dismissing his petition in which he accused Michael Hunt and Lee Nation of malice, perjury, obstruction of justice and denial of due process. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Emily Omohundro vs. Denny Hoskins, Missouri Secretary of State, et al.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictJanuary 29, 2026#WD88567
The court reversed the trial court's approval of the summary statement for an initiative petition seeking to amend the Missouri Constitution to prevent public funds from benefiting nonpublic schools. The court agreed with the appellant that the summary statement was insufficient and unfair, and certified an alternative statement to the Secretary of State for inclusion on the ballot.
Sean Soendker Nicholson, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, vs. State of Missouri, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101308
The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's judgment and declared Senate Bill 22 unconstitutional, finding it violated the Missouri Constitution's original purpose requirement. The court invalidated SB 22 in its entirety, determining that the bill's scope expanded far beyond its original stated purpose of amending ballot summary procedures to include unrelated provisions regarding judicial appeals.
E.N., individually and as next friend and on behalf of her minor child, N.N., et al., Appellants, v. Mike Kehoe, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, et al., Respondents.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 13, 2026#SC100933
The court upheld the constitutionality of Missouri's SAFE Act and Medicaid ban, which prohibit gender transition medical treatments for minors. Challengers failed to demonstrate that these statutes violate due process, equal protection, or the gains of industry clause provisions of the Missouri Constitution.
IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.S.: N.A.W., Respondent vs. R.L.S., II, Appellant(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictApril 23, 2025#SD38621
Republic Finance, LLC, Respondent, v. Quintin Ray, Appellant.(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 24, 2024#ED112283