OTT LAW

Christopher Gregory, Appellant, State of Missouri, Respondent

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Christopher Gregory, Appellant, State of Missouri, Respondent Case Number: 72440 Handdown Date: 01/20/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Melvyn W. Wiesman Counsel for Appellant: S. Paige Canfield Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J. Opinion: ORDER Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record provided on appeal and we conclude the motion court's finding is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions