OTT LAW

David Felling and Dennis Fitzwilliam, Appellants, v. Larry Giles, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: David Felling and Dennis Fitzwilliam, Appellants, v. Larry Giles, Respondent. Case Number: 72060 Handdown Date: 02/24/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr. Counsel for Appellant: Gary Siegel Counsel for Respondent: Hugh R. Law Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellants, David Felling and Dennis Fitzwilliam, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis entered in favor of respondent, Larry Giles, on plaintiffs' petition insofar as the court held no partnership existed between the parties and further found appellants were not entitled to an accounting. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions