David Kierst, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.A.H., Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: David Kierst, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.A.H., Appellant. Case Number: 54005 Handdown Date: 12/30/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. C. William Kramer Counsel for Appellant: Madonna L. Limberg Counsel for Respondent: Robert Schieber Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Lowenstein, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER The juvenile, L. A. H., appeals from the Family Court's decision to sustain the juvenile officer's motion to modify the juvenile's prior disposition. The issue on appeal was whether the evidence was sufficient to prove his possession of a controlled substance. Section 195.202, RSMo 1994. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b) V.A.M.R. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450
Dana Jensen vs. Division of Employment Security(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictOctober 29, 2024#WD86895