Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Donald A. Witt, Respondent, v. Jo Ellen Witt, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Jo Ellen Witt
Respondent
Donald A. Witt

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Donald A. Witt, Respondent, v. Jo Ellen Witt, Appellant. Case Number: 54051 Handdown Date: 03/03/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Platte County, Hon. Carl D. Gum Counsel for Appellant: Thomas E. Hankins Counsel for Respondent: Abe Shafer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ellis, P.J., Howard and Riederer, J.J., concur. Opinion: Jo Ellen Witt appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of Platte County dissolving her marriage to Donald A. Witt. Perceiving no jurisprudential value in a published opinion, we enter this summary order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum opinion explaining our decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion