OTT LAW

Dynamic Cable Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Fiber Cable, Inc., Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Dynamic Cable Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Fiber Cable, Inc., Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 72167 Handdown Date: 02/24/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Herbert Lasky Counsel for Appellant: Stephen R. Clark Counsel for Respondent: Mark R. Dunn Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER In this jury-tried case, plaintiff sued defendant for breach of three contracts. The jury found for plaintiff and awarded $272,640 damages. Defendant raises five points on appeal. The first alleges the trial court erred in granting plaintiff's motion in limine to prohibit defendant from offering evidence as to the time within which plaintiff was to perform. The next three points allege the trial court erred in refusing to give three instructions defendant tendered. The final point alleges error in denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions