Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Evan D. Gammill and Dorothea E. Gammill, Appellants, v. W. Joseph Ketcherside, M.D., Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Medical Negligence Claim Route

Reading this opinion because of a medical injury?

Medical-negligence questions need a careful record timeline and early screening. Use this route when the opinion research connects to suspected care-related harm.

Useful Intake Details

  • Provider names
  • Key treatment dates
  • What changed after the event
Medical MalpracticeReview The Medical Malpractice Guide

Parties & Roles

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar medical malpractice issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Evan D. Gammill and Dorothea E. Gammill, Appellants, v. W. Joseph Ketcherside, M.D., Respondent. Case Number: 53156 Handdown Date: 12/16/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Clay County, Hon. James E. Welsh Counsel for Appellant: Don B. Roberson Counsel for Respondent: J. Michael Shaffer & Charles H. Stitt Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Howard, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, JJ., concur. Opinion: Order Appeal from a judgment in a medical malpractice action. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion