OTT LAW

In the Interest of A.L.H., a minor, K.E. and H.E., Petitioners/Respondents, v. A.H., Respondent/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: In the Interest of A.L.H., a minor, K.E. and H.E., Petitioners/Respondents, v. A.H., Respondent/Appellant. Case Number: 71956 Handdown Date: 12/23/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. James J. Gallagher Counsel for Appellant: Robert Keith Bennett Counsel for Respondent: John R. Bird and Jeff Childress Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Mother appeals from the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions