OTT LAW

In the Interest of: J.G., P.G., C.G. and B.G., Plaintiff, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.G. (Natural Father), C.G. (Natural Mother), Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: In the Interest of: J.G., P.G., C.G. and B.G., Plaintiff, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.G. (Natural Father), C.G. (Natural Mother), Appellant. Case Number: 53343, 53409 and 53607 Handdown Date: 10/14/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. C. William Kramer Counsel for Appellant: Steven G. Sakoulas, Steven R. Schanker and Brian C. Fries Counsel for Respondent: Kyla Grove and Robert M. Schieber Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Howard, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellants C.G. and R.G. appeal the trial court's order terminating their parental rights to their four children. They claim that the trial court did not have clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support its judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no reversible error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions