In the Interest of: T.S., Petitioner, Callaway County Juvenile Office, Respondent, v. A.S. (Natural Father), C.S. (Natural Mother), Appellants.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: In the Interest of: T.S., Petitioner, Callaway County Juvenile Office, Respondent, v. A.S. (Natural Father), C.S. (Natural Mother), Appellants. Case Number: Nos. 53292/53300 Handdown Date: 08/19/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Callaway County, Hon. Cary G. Augustine Counsel for Appellant: James C. Dowling and Paul J. Stingley Counsel for Respondent: Maureen Monaghan Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ellis, P.J., Lowenstein and Howard, JJ., concur. Opinion: Natural mother and father appeal from a judgment of the Juvenile Division of the Family Court of Boone County, Missouri terminating their parental rights to their minor son, T.S., pursuant to Section 211.447.2(3), RSMo 1994. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450