In the Matter of D.A.B. Alesya Beaird Litvinov, Appellant v. Paul G. Beaird, et al., Respondents.
Decision date: October 11, 2007
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Case Style: In the Matter of D.A.B. Alesya Beaird Litvinov, Appellant v. Paul G. Beaird, et al., Respondents. Case Number: 28099 Handdown Date: 10/11/2007 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Dallas County, Hon. Larry M. Burditt Counsel for Appellant: Deirdre O'Donnell Counsel for Respondent: Verna L. Haun Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: JOHN E. PARRISH, Presiding Judge Opinion Vote: REVERSED AND REMANDED. Bates and Scott, JJ., concur Opinion: Alesya Litvinov appeals a judgment dismissing her petition for declaration of paternity and the cross-petition of Konstantin Litvinov for declaration of paternity. This appeal is directed to the same judgment as the appeal in No. 28095. The opinion in No. 28095 has been filed contemporaneous herewith. That opinion is reported at In re D.A.B., ___ S.W.3d ___ (Mo.App. SD No. 28095 filed October 11, 2007). The action that resulted in the judgment that is the subject of this appeal was brought pursuant to the Uniform Parentage Act (the UPA) as enacted in Missouri, Sections 210.817 -- 210.852, RSMo 2000. The issue in this appeal is the same as in No. 28095. The facts and rationale that are set forth in the opinion filed in No. 28095 are determinative. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded. Separate Opinion:
None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450