Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Jay Walter, Appellant, v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, P.C., and Alan R. Doerhoff, M.D., Respondents.

Decision date: Unknown

Medical Negligence Claim Route

Reading this opinion because of a medical injury?

Medical-negligence questions need a careful record timeline and early screening. Use this route when the opinion research connects to suspected care-related harm.

Useful Intake Details

  • Provider names
  • Key treatment dates
  • What changed after the event
Medical MalpracticeReview The Medical Malpractice Guide

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Jay Walter

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar medical malpractice issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Jay Walter, Appellant, v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, P.C., and Alan R. Doerhoff, M.D., Respondents. Case Number: No. 53614 Handdown Date: 09/23/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Cole County, Hon. Thomas J. Brown, III Counsel for Appellant: Connie J. Clark Counsel for Respondent: Duane E. Schreimann Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Smith, P.J., Spinden and Ellis, JJ., concur. Opinion: Order Jay Walter appeals from the trial court's denial of her motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, her motion to amend, correct or modify the judgment. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion