Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED83759

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Orders pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b) Case Number: Handdown Date: 12/28/2004 Appeal From: Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Opinion Vote: Opinion: THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) ON DECEMBER 28, 2004. ED83759 In re: Marriage of Elizabeth Haverman and Dale Haverman. Elizabeth Haverman v. Dale Haverman. ED83816 Bernice Harris v. State of Missouri, Department of Mental Health, and Monica Jones ED84833 Melissa Hogue v. Crabtree Harmon THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE DISPOSED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) ON DECEMBER 28, 2004. ED83854 State of Missouri v. Craig D. White Affirmed. Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion