OTT LAW

Orders pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED84748

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Orders pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b) Case Number: Handdown Date: 12/27/2005 Appeal From: Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Opinion Vote: Opinion: THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) ON DECEMBER 27, 2005. ED84748 Jason White v. State of Missouri ED85509 City of Wentzville v. Shirley Dodson ED85713 Robert E. Daniel v. State of Missouri ED85870 Diondra Barnes v. State of Missouri ED85905 Terrell A. Johnson v. State of Missouri ED85948 Alfred R. McMullan, Jr. v. State of Missouri

ED85958 John King v. State of Missouri ED85976 Dolores Belpulsi v. Charles Schmitt & Company and Division of Employment Security ED86028 David Linn (Scott) Kelley and Brandee Jolynn Scott, a minor child by her next friend, David Linn (Scott) Kelley v. Barry David Moore ED86066 Charles Mertzlufft v. Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis and Board of Trustees of Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis ED86140 Terry Travis v. State of Missouri ED86183 Diana Gaedig v. Global Environmental Laboratories and Division of Employment Security ED86219 David Byers v. Kuna Meat Company, Inc. ED86271 Scharad T. Hutchins v. Bellefontaine Habilitation Center ED86550 Herbert Betts v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE DISPOSED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) ON DECEMBER 27, 2005. ED84913 State of Missouri v. Curtis Bell Affirmed. ED84946 State of Missouri v. David W. Alcorn Affirmed. ED85166 State of Missouri v. Elton Mullins Affirmed. ED85682 State of Missouri v. Joseph M. Murchison Affirmed. ED85744 State of Missouri v. William D. Davis Affirmed.

Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions