Orders pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b)
Decision date: UnknownED84748
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Orders pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b) Case Number: Handdown Date: 12/27/2005 Appeal From: Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Opinion Vote: Opinion: THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) ON DECEMBER 27, 2005. ED84748 Jason White v. State of Missouri ED85509 City of Wentzville v. Shirley Dodson ED85713 Robert E. Daniel v. State of Missouri ED85870 Diondra Barnes v. State of Missouri ED85905 Terrell A. Johnson v. State of Missouri ED85948 Alfred R. McMullan, Jr. v. State of Missouri
ED85958 John King v. State of Missouri ED85976 Dolores Belpulsi v. Charles Schmitt & Company and Division of Employment Security ED86028 David Linn (Scott) Kelley and Brandee Jolynn Scott, a minor child by her next friend, David Linn (Scott) Kelley v. Barry David Moore ED86066 Charles Mertzlufft v. Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis and Board of Trustees of Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis ED86140 Terry Travis v. State of Missouri ED86183 Diana Gaedig v. Global Environmental Laboratories and Division of Employment Security ED86219 David Byers v. Kuna Meat Company, Inc. ED86271 Scharad T. Hutchins v. Bellefontaine Habilitation Center ED86550 Herbert Betts v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE DISPOSED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) ON DECEMBER 27, 2005. ED84913 State of Missouri v. Curtis Bell Affirmed. ED84946 State of Missouri v. David W. Alcorn Affirmed. ED85166 State of Missouri v. Elton Mullins Affirmed. ED85682 State of Missouri v. Joseph M. Murchison Affirmed. ED85744 State of Missouri v. William D. Davis Affirmed.
Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
AIG Agency, Inc., d/b/a Associated Insurance Group, Appellant, vs. Missouri General Insurance Agency, Inc., Jim Baxendale and Mitch O'Brien, Respondents.(2015)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 3, 3015#ED102096
Christopher Hanshaw, Appellant, vs. Crown Equipment Corp., et al., Respondents.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101091
The court affirmed the circuit court's decision to exclude Hanshaw's expert witness testimony and grant summary judgment to Crown Equipment in a product liability case involving an allegedly defectively designed forklift. The expert's opinions were properly excluded because they were not supported by reliable methodology, as the expert performed no tests and failed to demonstrate how cited research and data supported his conclusions.
Mouna Apperson, f/k/a Nicholas Apperson, Appellant, vs. Natasha Kaminsky, et al., Respondents.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101020
The court affirmed the directed verdict as to four counts against Norman based on agency but vacated and remanded the defamation counts against Kaminsky and one count against Norman, finding that the circuit court erred in requiring independent evidence of reputational damage beyond the plaintiff's own testimony when the evidence of harm was substantial and directly resulted from the defendants' statements.
K.A.C. by and through, ASHLEY ACOSTA, NEXT FRIEND, and MICHAEL CRITES, JR., Appellants v. MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL., Respondents(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictJanuary 12, 2026#SD38943
Appellants sought damages for a wrongful death resulting from a motor vehicle collision involving a pursued driver, alleging the Missouri State Highway Patrol's pursuit was negligent and proximately caused the collision. The court affirmed summary judgment for MSHP, finding that Appellants failed to produce sufficient facts demonstrating that MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, which is a necessary element of their case.
Mark and Sherry Davis, and David and Denise Kamm; Kevin Laughlin vs. City of Kearney, Missouri(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictDecember 16, 2025#WD87389