Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED100651

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

APRIL 7, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED100651 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JARON SIMS, APP
  1. ED100970 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARNELL CLEMONS, APP
  1. ED101004 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CORNELIOUS JONES, APP
  1. ED101013 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMES STAMPLEY, APP
  1. ED101042 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DANIEL K. MCKAY, APP
  1. ED101320 CHRISTOPHER PIERSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED101358 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD LEONARD, JR.,

APP

  1. ED101484 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V GLEN SCOTT EVANS, APP
  1. ED101516 RICHARD L. BOBBITT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED101540 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JORDAN SHELTON III, APP
  1. ED101575 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DANTE HARWELL, APP
  1. ED101604 IN MATTER OF CARE AND TREATMENT CHARLES

BOLDEN APP

  1. ED101894 MOORLANDS HOLDINGS APP V METRO STL SEWER DIST

RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion