Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED100809

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

JUNE 9, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED100809 LISA JAMES-MILLER, APP V. AMERICAN FAMILY, RES
  1. ED101032 BRITTANY FRAVELL, RES V DENNIS CANNON, APP
  1. ED101193 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ERNEST RAY, APP
  1. ED101317 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CHRISTOPHER RANSFER,

APP

  1. ED101329 GEORGE JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED101462 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CALVIN TAYLOR, APP
  1. ED101603 JOHN THOMAS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED101613 TARA WARD ET AL, APP V WEST CO MOTOR CO RES/CR

APP

  1. ED101832 IN THE MATTER OF CARE & TREATMENT OF JODY KIRK
  1. ED101886 LARRY CORDELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

JUNE 9, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED102054 WILLIE WILSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102059 PAUL PARKER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102393 AALCO WRECKING CO., APP V MICHAEL AGNEW, DEC

RES

  1. ED102409 LARRY YOUNG, APP V DES, RES
  1. ED102451 S.R. BY NEXT FRIEND, S.H.R., RES V K.M., APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion