OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED101559

Opinion

OCTOBER 6, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED101559 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V THOMAS P. LEBON, APP
  1. ED101802 MICHAEL COFFMAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED101887 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V GARY L. FULK, APP
  1. ED102063 JAMES LEE SHIELDS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102139 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V NATHANIEL DAVIS, APP
  1. ED102146 DANIEL AUSTIN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102155 JOSEPH KALISZEWSKI, APP V NEWELL DUBAIL & DES

RES

  1. ED102227 SHEILA A. DRIEMEYER, RES V JAMES LEAHY, APP
  1. ED102271 FEDERAL NAT'L MORTGAGE RES V KENNETH ROGERS

APP

  1. ED102297 DURON COCKRELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

OCTOBER 6, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED102442 JEROME MCCLENDON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED102457 ROOSEVELT LIVINGSTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED102497 ARTHUR JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102551 LEONARD SLOCUM, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102597 DARBY O'TOOLE'S PUB & GRUB, RES V THOELE, APP
  1. ED102618 GARY MOORE, APP V RAIL LOGISTICS & DES, RES
  1. ED102622 KENNETH WILSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions