Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED103436

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

NOVEMBER 22, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED103436 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RANDY COLLIER, APP
  1. ED103519 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LARELL MURPHY, APP
  1. ED103527 RICKY LANE, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED103711 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JEROME EDWARDS, APP
  1. ED103720 TYRONE WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED103810 ANNETTE VRABEL, RES V MICHAEL VRABEL, APP
  1. ED103905 FLETCHER PRYOR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED103925 DONNELL DURLEY APP V STL CITY MUNI POLICE ETAL

RES

  1. ED103989 CHALANDA GARRETT APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE

RES

  1. ED104088 ERIC STRONG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

NOVEMBER 22, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED104264 IN THE ESTATE OF: ORA LEVINE, DECEASED
  1. ED104420 ANTHONY FINERSON, APP V. JILL LANG, ET AL., RES

CORRECTION(S):

  1. ED103508 M.B. BY NF MECHELLE HITT, PLT V ABBOTT LAB, APP

WITHDRAWAL(S):

  1. ED103962 COLLECTOR OF REVENUE, RES V PARCELS OF LAND,

DFT

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion