Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED103841

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

MARCH 28, 2017

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED103841 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CALVIN M. WILLIS, APP

2. ED104034 SANTI JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

3. ED104084 KENNETH M. TAYLOR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

4. ED104089 MARTY MOSS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

5. ED104105 TAMARA R. YAO, RES V FRANCK W. YAO, APP

6. ED104251 REYNALDO SIMMONS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

7. ED104256 FELICIA BRAUN, RES V THE CITY OF STL ET AL, APP

8. ED104397 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAVID M. JOHNSON, APP

9. ED104605 DONALD NICHOLSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

  1. ED104637 JAMES BOLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,
  1. ED104658 BRIAN BOHLEN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED104662 CHAKITA COBURN APP V OZELLA FOSTER FUNERAL SRV, RES
  1. ED104699 LONNIE SNELLING, APP V JESSE WOODFIN ET AL, DFT

CORRECTION:

  1. ED104220 DEMETRIUS EDWARDS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion