OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED104356

Opinion

OCTOBER 17, 2017

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED104356 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMES KOBERMANN, APP
  1. ED104384 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CORTEZ MCCLINTON, APP
  1. ED104626 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOSEPH P. HUNAULT, APP
  1. ED104665 MICHAEL KNUDSEN APP V PHILLIP GRINDSTAFF ET AL

RES

  1. ED104691 TYRONE MITCHELL, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED104713 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DEVEIS D. SANDS, APP
  1. ED104728 MYRON JAMAR KIMBLE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED104753 JESSE REED, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED104778 IN THE MATTER OF CARE & TREATMENT OF: R.B.
  1. ED104786 LACLEDE GAS CO., APP V DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER,

RES

OCTOBER 17, 2017

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED104811 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LADELL PHILLIPS, APP
  1. ED104866 DAVID MARTIN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED105092 METRO ST LOUIS SEWER, RES V. ROBERT SEEHAUSEN,

APP

  1. ED105188 PENNY E. JOHNSTON, RES V ROY R. JOHNSTON, JR.,

APP

  1. ED105228 E.A.B., RES V S.K., APP
  1. ED105261 ELTON NEAL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED105309 MAURICE WILSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED105433 NOAH SMITH, APP V RECONDITIONED APPLIANCES, RES

Related Opinions