OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED104385

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 12, 2017

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED104385 MICHAEL HRABOVSKY, APP V CITY OF ST. LOUIS, RES
  1. ED104530 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RAYMOND HICKMAN, APP
  1. ED104589 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ALBERT MILLSAPP, APP
  1. ED104597 JEFFREY SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED104652 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOSE RAMIREZ, APP
  1. ED104679 G. WENTZ ETAL, APP V OFALLON COMM ATHLETIC ETAL, RES
  1. ED104719 AKWASI SAWYER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED104741 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TOMMY DORA, APP
  1. ED104905 SCOTT M. DAVIS, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED105006 L. MCGEE, APP V BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL & DES, RES
  1. ED105037 MITA BISWAS, APP V DES, RES
  1. ED105211 NAKESHA ALFRED, APP V ANTHONY J. LATO, RES
  1. ED105249 CHARLES WHITE II, APP V TENET HEALTHSYSTEM ETAL, RES
  1. ED105471 MATTHEW B. RANDOLPH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions